TYB!!
>baker thinks Q was only talking about tweets, anon
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct 17 2020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
It can hardly be more clear that baker is correct.
>There is no Q_ANON
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct 17 2020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
Fags like you would say that War is good because the book war in peace says so. LOOK IT SAYS IT WAS THE BEST OF TIMES!
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct 17 2020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
>'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
Again, says nothing about getting rid of anything.
>Drop all references re: 'Q' 'Qanon' etc.to avoid ban/termination _censorship install.
In Mems ya stunted cunt
>And when they don't get their way, they'll just use VPN with multiple personalities to make it seem like anons are 'wrong'
Truth right there.
>Qanon isnt back. Q_Anon Research is what it is and what it has always been. reading comprehension cant be taught i guess.
You Sir have nailed it.
>Make your own board and invite Q on it, see what happens. Til then, stfu and gtfo, Q never had any issue with that banner.
Like Comms bakers did!