ID: f6a012 Nov. 2, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.11417030   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7074 >>7112

>>11416829

Is Hammer part of the DARPA technology stolen that McCraven and Hayden are using to defeat Trump.

 

If Q mentioned the Hammer, particularly Santa's Hammer in the Christmas pic, then I would assume Q team knows all about their attempts to steal the election and have taken necessary measures to stop them from stealing it.

 

Not only stop them, but catch them in the act.

Maybe the hammer will come down on the cheaters this Christmas.

Could the vote results be in dispute for that long of time?

 

I hope not, but I am kind of prepared for any twist in this movie.

ID: f6a012 Nov. 2, 2020, 5:31 p.m. No.11417160   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7323

>>11416829

>>11417074

https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/10/17/admiral-mcraven-in-nyt-remove-trump-from-office-the-sooner-the-better/

 

https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1559047454356/dems-deploying-darpa-funded-ai-driven-information-warfare-tool-to-target-pro-trump-accounts

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-deploying-darpa-funded-information-warfare-tool-to-promote-biden

ID: f6a012 Nov. 2, 2020, 5:39 p.m. No.11417264   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7319 >>7356 >>7357 >>7417

>>11417199

http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/

 

FRACTIONAL VOTING

 

1 – SUMMARY –

This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.

 

GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.

 

Fractionalized vote:

 

Instead of “1” the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.

 

What fractionalized votes can do:

 

They allow “weighting” of races. Weighting a race removes the principle of “one person-one vote” to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.

 

GEMS fractionalizes votes in three places:

 

The “Summary” vote tally, which provides overall election totals for each race on Election Night

The “Statement of Votes Cast”, which provides detailed results by precinct and voting method (ie. Polling, absentee, early, provisional)

The “undervote” count

Fractions in results reports are not visible.Votes containing decimals are reported as whole numbers unless specifically instructed to reveal decimals (which is not the default setting). All evidence that fractional values ever existed can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the decimals will fail to reveal they were used.

 

Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.

 

Fractionalizing the votes which create the Summary Results allows alteration of Election Night Web results and results sent to the Secretary of State, as well as results available at and local election officials.

 

Fractionalizing the “Statement of Votes Cast” allows an extraordinary amount of precision, enabling alteration of results by specific voting machine, absentee batch, or precinct. Vote results can be altered for polling places in predominantly Black neighborhoods, and can parse out precincts within a mixed batch of early or absentee votes.

 

Fractionalizing the undervote category allows reallocation of valid votes into undervotes.

 

 

==In short, if votes are counted as decimals. as is 1.0 instead of a whole integer such as 1, cheating can occure.

 

programs can be made to count votes as 1.1 or 1.1 or 1.3 or 1.4….all of which would still round to 1 but if added together and then rounded to a whole number could greatly increase the count.