Baker, bro, if specifically CHANGING the thumbnail the past few days is TRULY that important an issuenow of all timesbecause someone is trying to set-up Q, allow one of them to provide you some evidence of such.
Whatever faults are or aren't in the thumbnail now aren't important, or "priority-wise" as one said, enough to warrant debating it now; it's served as such for years. Why expend the effort changing it now?
Keep on and hold the line, fam.
(Just because a collective (((they))) are making an argument of it, doesn't mean it's something real anon's actually give a fuck about to such an chosen extent right now)
What are you trying to use the other night's thumbnail shill-fest to imply?
No one would surmise which was supposed to be the intended from the variants posted.
Doesn't even show the original on there, apart from 14550?
They will likely never clarify what they mean, just hoping you'd infer something from it.
Still waiting for "barkeep" to debate my post lb as he so tried roping an implication of my intent from.
I'm so gonna hope that ISN'T a B.O./B.V., 'cus…damn, thoroughly unimpressed, and I give people wa-a-a-a-y too much credit to begin with.
The "totally legit and organic" discussion you're referring to was about shills "discussing" weather to change the thumbnail at the dead end of a bread within minutes and then doing so because it has "consent" within 30 seconds, and now here we are, days later…
I was there for it: it was shovelled horseshit from the start.
Oh, (((you)))…