Note how overly friendly the barkeep baker has been toward our baker and anon's the past few breads since being called out en masse where usually there would be arrogance and vile from their corner.
Think how they'll play such newfound compliance tonight when dupe breads are "accidentally" all over the place.
No red eyes, so a beauty, at least.
Is dropping the "_ANON" really all about the media set up? I can see it, but I thought there was something meatier behind it.
I can actually see it, though–see why that particular word could be used as a set-up on "totally legit" anon's doing really bad things.
Hmm…
(No red eyes on the lion, though: the perfect version from times past)
I'll direct you to >>11423008 I actually covered and agreed with your sentiment now someone explained it.
No: you bake for (((them))).
>if the banner should be up for grabs
Literally, the best, most clear way of putting this whole debate.
Only a shame you say it once we're already iterations deep, including alterations people don't even notice (Red eyes).
(((They))) have all been awfully timid tonight, considering the backlash.
An odd 180 in personality for most people who thrive on the fame.
I do love when this place lets it fangs show. I feel we're only waking up from the nap now, however: the next 24 hours are going to be something else.
Now you're just pontificating on the point I already agreed with, but the initial layman's terms were the kicker.
I wonder where all the shills have gone since the verbal tanning and B.O. coming to assuage us.
I'm gonna try and convince myself it was just because the rally is over, and not because some space needed to be made to (((neutralize))) any uprising against the shills like earlier.