>Shills have been fairly quiet.
Have you notice that the muhjoo shills disappeared when campaign to change the banner graphic started?
When you read it like this (pic) you understand what it's all about.
This coming from the baker (barkeep) is confirmation.
That can be arranged.
>not being obtuse
That post is about avoiding censorship in social media. That not a problem here.
That's not what I'm saying. See: >>11424507
These are not proposed banners. They're commentary on the whole kerfuffle.
>I think Q dropping in the bread that had the _ANON stripped when there were 3 open breads in the catalog, one with Q_ANON in it is evidence to support the position I am taking
No it's fucking not!!!
This has already been explained.
So was I. Look at the catalog right now. You see proof in the post counts of those three breads that it was not about the banners.
I pronounce you retarded. We're done here.
>Good lord are we still bitchin' over the thumbnail?
It's not really about the thumbnail. It about shining a spotlight on a team of shills that is trying to take over.