Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Jan. 29, 2018, 12:24 p.m. No.202487   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>202419

Yes - THANKS! Listened to it all the way through and already forgot some of these things. Thanks for noting them. Interesting that Trump was involved w/plan for couple of decades.

 

Great work noting info!

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Jan. 30, 2018, 11:58 a.m. No.213117   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3254

>>212580

As Dilley has repeatedly stated, this cannot be properly vetted until or if it is shown to be true. I'll wait to see what unfolds, but it's an interesting heads up nonetheless. It also wouldn't surprise me because of the problems experienced by many voters with the electronic voting machines in previous elections. Beyond this, there appears to be a huge problem with voter fraud that only the LEFT refuses to acknowledge.

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Jan. 31, 2018, 8:20 a.m. No.222906   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2559

>>220945

I heard that too. He was speaking AGAINST the asinine "catch & release" under Obama. Known terrorists should not be caught and released. They only wind up on the battlefield again. GITMO will likely be around for a long time.

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Jan. 31, 2018, 12:03 p.m. No.225411   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5419 >>5432

>>224887

Your question makes NO sense. You seem to want to argue about something that cannot be proven one way or another until or if it comes to pass.

 

We are ALL free to agree/disagree w/info provided. I don’t see anyone trying to force anyone to believe anything. It’s all simply a place to exchange ideas. That’s it.

 

Is ANYONE here attempting to coerce you or anyone else into simple accepting what either Q or Dilley is stating is true? Anyone?

 

If not why are you getting so bent? Seems like wasted energy.

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Jan. 31, 2018, 12:35 p.m. No.225722   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Okay, I'll take your word for it. I'd like it to be real too. I'd also like the MEMO to have already been released.

 

I also see DOJ has moved to drop bribery case against Mendendez - not sure exactly why unless they truly mean that they didn't have enough evidence to convict.

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Feb. 2, 2018, 1:21 p.m. No.250478   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4199 >>8460

>>244937

Actually according to context the “woman” in Rev 12 is the final remnant of ISRAEL. Occurs at midpoint of Trubulation (Mt 24). Because AntiChrist can’t get to the “woman,” he goes after others (Christians). This actually takes place in the Middle East w/commentators believing that the “woman” flees to a safe place in what was Edom.

 

Note the woman in Rev 12 is clearly said to be Israel because she gives birth to Jesus who came from Israel’s tribe of Benjamin and who ultimately was taken up to heaven after Hus death and resurrection. I don’t want to argue. Simply saying if context means anything it cannot be referring to USA or the Church.

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Feb. 3, 2018, 5:47 a.m. No.256765   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>256686

I’ve always understood he’s simply an AGENT of Rothschilds like he was an agent of Hitler.

 

Rothschilds will dump him as soon as they no longer need him…just like they’re going “Obama who?”

Anonymous ID: 46a0bf Feb. 3, 2018, 10:17 a.m. No.258545   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>257788

Excellent explanation. I remember those day and I also remember when things started changing.

 

Whether truly religious or not ppl had a genuine moral compass for most things in the “old” days. That’s gone today and severe factions are the result of it.