Agree
What happened to 1/30?
Thank you for what you are doing. This intel unfortunately is being delivered to us by what I would call 'a rambler'. And your summaries are concise and accurate.
We also need to recognise Zach (from Alex Jones fame) as his intel is also cross-referencing Dilley's source. Yesterday he confirmed that McCabe and Alwaaled 'sang like birds'. I don't believe that Q mentioned these two. He also confirmed the train was being monitered by helicopters and drones and the roads around the track had been closed off. He talks about the missile launch on Hawaii from a submarine and he tells of a proposed false flag at the Superbowl involving Somarlians and a 'dirty bomb'.
Alternatively Dilley's source could be proving disinfo.
What criteria do you use to rule in/out a source?
One source provides it anonymously, another provides it to an unknown social media flower and the other to a lunatic who provides an alternative news service.
What's the difference?
Sorry, I did not make myself clear. As this thread is titled 'alternative intel source' I was trying to determine what criteria is used when deciding what alternative intel is to be included here?