Still not satisfied. I want to know why all the truth won't come out…eventually. I get the protection of sources and methods and I get the idea to shock only enough to wake people up without killing them. Perhaps details don't need to be known, but if it's satanic rituals involving torture and death of people, at least say that. We need a degree of evil, at least at some level within and across different leaders throughout society and in such a way that the knowledge can be accurately recorded and passed down through the generations.

And if you're not going to say why, then why not? What makes you better hiding info this time? What makes you different from them? What makes all of this evil not able to come back from the abyss, albeit in 50, 100, or 1000s years. Light…and trust. Unless you've spoken with the creator and the message is to only show us 40%, then is there a lack of faith in the light?

I get it. It's probably a really difficult political and philosophical question to weed through. Maybe not knowing is better, but I'd still like a legitimate response as to why. To date, I've just heard a bunch of excuses…and you know what they say about excuses.

Anyway, thanks for these posts. Getting pretty tired of cryptic Q, but thank God for everyone involved.

>>163625

Maybe. Whatever the reason, I wanna hear it from the horse's mouth.

>>164407

No.

They think they can control it by taking out a few bad eggs…put pandora back in the box…

Red pill us a bit, but don't wake everyone up.

There needs to be a collective awaking to the stain on humanity for posterity.

What? They think will all this tech, they can avoid another cabal? Maybe for a while…

New tech is coming. It's decentralized and encrypted. The only reason Trump is winning is because of the ability to see comms. That won't be possible anymore. It will bring great things for people and humanity. Maybe it will even decentralize governance such that the type of cabal today would be impossible in the future. But just as life finds a way, evil finds one too. Its got to be epic and total.

>>164593

Executive Order. Dec 22, I think. War powers declared.

>>164616

And Trump has 90 days.

>>164636

Good point. It must go back further then. Is there another similar EO?

>>164636

Dec 22 EO was human trafficking.

Obama got rounded up on something else?

Rounding him up doesn't mean he was charged. Maybe just brought in for questioning…

Clearly he's be out and about since then, right? Or was it just the one time to the wedding since then?

>>164714

If he was commander-in-chief, he's military. I don't think it needs to be wartime.

>>165662

It's a team of guys.

There's one that kind of does the PR part.

>>169595

That's not what Q has said. He's reiterated that some stuff is just too dark, meaning the behaviors of the targets, not the operations. Yea, I don't really want to hear about torture techniques or whatever. But I do want to hear about all the criminals and at least an overview of what they've done…enough to give the world public's imagination a spin. 100% of the crimes, 40% of the details.

Here is a great summary: https:// www.youtube. com/watch?v=7kTZ6EerZjc

It reminded me of something and it's potentially why we shouldn't know the other 60-80%.

"But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt."

We need most people to stay pure and move forward without looking back. Trust that justice will be done. That's a hard dose to swallow being someone that likes to know the details. There will are definitely people who are choosing to stay behind and become pillars of salt so that justice may be done. Certainly, there will soon come a time when it will be clear that it's the moment flee the city and not look back.

>>174341

curious.

He's definitely not around. Still free and hiding or not?

>>177928

This is why I question the shaming of Lot's wife. Maybe looking back will make us hard, but not the FUD of becoming pillars of salt. Maybe if Lot had looked back instead of getting drunk an impregnating his daughters, the the cycle of sin might not have seeded itself anew IMMEDIATELY after the destruction of it.

>>224768

Crozet is part of greater C'ville, just outside the official city limits.

TG>DAG

He's the GOP-appointed one who House Intel asked to be the point man for digging on all the documents because of his prosecutor background.

>>225286

What does [HEC is F9-Sx_VB8239] mean?

>>268288

>>268314

Right… Falcon 8 heavy is set to launch on tuesday.

>>268669

Falcon 9* Heavy

>>258793

>But, like everyone else, I'm just an observer

Wrong. Citizens are the government. We'll decide what happens to them. I'd love to see them hang, but perhaps in a grand act of mercy, we could let them sweat it out in Cuba for the rest of their lives. Wait, maybe hanging would be more merciful. Joking aside and regardless of punishment, we must still collectively figure out how to never forget, but still forgive. No more myths.

>>268793

ISBN?

>>268793

https:// www.hec.nasa.gov

>>268943

A.I.?

>>268922

I'm good on the local space stuff and on the probes…I feel good about the mars rovers, etc. The Apollo missions, at least the landings are very suspect. The Europeans screwed up a rover landing on Mars…not to mention we could never take off after the types of modern landings we do. That in consideration, it's ridiculous to think we not only made a landing but a take off from the moon. Did we go around it, sure, why not. The physics of that is easy. The alien stuff, well, I'm not convinced, but I wouldn't toss it out if I saw something more than just lights in the sky. That said, I'm perfectly open to other life in the universe. Seems obvious. I think we definitely have some tech that would seem alien at least. We'll find out what we do have hopefully. I imagine it will be step by step to help out humanity, keep certain technologies hidden for now, and for heaven's sake stop using the tech to fuck with people at the very minimum.

>>269030

"We the people" is all, nothing more, nothing less.

>>269048

you'll have to be more specific.

Not sure what you're talking about with missing data.

photoshopped pictures? From the moon or local?

Different sized land masses?

>>269012

VandeNBERG

>>269296

Not going to engage with this. Show your evidence.