>>11450376 pb
That's good info.
Because of covid, states are doing things weird and those weird things allow for fraud, and they make it difficult to really understand how many ballots there are to count.
I'm looking at the New York Times page. North Carolina. You show all precincts reporting, the number you have is 2732. Nyt has "95% of estimated votes reported" and the same 2732.
What is going on there?
I think you're overstating things.
I've been following what is going on, but I might have missed something big.
This covid has caused a fucking with to our election system. We have 5 simultaneous Florida 2000s, but at this point, they're not even close.
It seemed like many states were not prepared to do their jobs tonight. Counting ballots takes time, be prepared for a long night which means that you're just plowing through without sleep. But they stopped counting. Which I read as opportunity to do fraud.
no they don't have 99% in.
it's a weird covid thing.
There are these other ballots that aren't "precincts".
I don't know how it works, but New York Times doesn't have 99%,
There are 5 states that Trump is winning, and it looks like they could just call the winner.
Pennsylvania
MIchigan
Wisconsin
North Carolina
Georgia
He seems to have won those states. To me. In a normal year, yes. But this is crazy covid time. And that means there could be all types of weird ballots.
Oh look, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Wolf and Whitmer.