>>11453080

> you need to convince them with stronger stuff then epstein nxvium and weinstein, that was weak, im sure you thought it was strong, the anons did too. but to the dems it was weak..

this

I've been saying this for months. There appears to be a distinct difference between what the administration thinks are bombshells and what the public think are bombshells in 2020.

there's only so far you can go with Hunter biden dick pics. It wasn't Joe and frankly porn is all over the place with the internet. Now we have to deal with the riots post election, because apparently those are better than the riots pre election with DAMNING hardcore evidence (not fucking documents:video, clear pics of JOE)

>>11453176

>1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?

>2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?

>3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?

>4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?

what if we had just SpecOp'ed the places where the fake ballots were in the first place?

I hate having it all, and still letting the dumb shit occur.