>>1146261

The investigation was manufactured to look like it was official.

Frankly, the sloppy manner in which this farce was perpetrated implies that those wishing to remove Trump severely underestimated his WILL, FORTITUDE and RESILIENCE.

Here were just some of the tells of not only the illegal coordination but the sloppiness:

1. Obama allows the elements of the phony dossier to be disseminated across the entire spectrum of career intelligence/governmental employees - a majority of whom were anti-Trump.

This guaranteed WEAPONIZATION of the false allegations within the dossier.

1. Brennan/Clapper, et al used the phony allegation that 'ALL 17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES' have reviewed and deem the dossier a valid intelligence product.

2. Michael Isikoff used former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele as an anonymous source to verify the phony dossier when, in fact, Steele was involved in creating the dossier. Concurrent with this anonymous verification of the dossier was a FISA warrant which the deep state was requesting to 'spy' on members of the Trump campaign. The thing is, the article by Michael Isikoff which cited his anonymous source (Christopher Steele - creator of the dossier) was used as evidence to the FISA court to persuade the judges to allow the surveillance warrant.

THE TOPPER IS THAT THE FISA WARRANT WAS A FARCE ANYWAY. THE DEEP STATE WAS ALREADY ILLEGALLY SPYING UPON TRUMP THROUGH AND WITH THEIR FIVE EYES INTELLIGENCE PARTNERS.

THE PURPOSE OF THE FISA WARRANTS WERE NEVER TO SPY ON TRUMP BUT, RATHER, TO CONCEAL THE SOURCE OF THE INTELLIGENCE - FIVE EYES.

>>1146649

The investigation was manufactured to look like it was official.

Frankly, the sloppy manner in which this farce was perpetrated implies that those wishing to remove Trump severely underestimated his WILL, FORTITUDE and RESILIENCE.

Here were just some of the tells of not only the illegal coordination but the sloppiness:

1. Obama allows the elements of the phony dossier to be disseminated across the entire spectrum of career intelligence/governmental employees - a majority of whom were anti-Trump.

This guaranteed WEAPONIZATION of the false allegations within the dossier.

1. Brennan/Clapper, et al used the phony allegation that 'ALL 17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES' have reviewed and deem the dossier a valid intelligence product.

2. Michael Isikoff used former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele as an anonymous source to verify the phony dossier when, in fact, Steele was involved in creating the dossier. Concurrent with this anonymous verification of the dossier was a FISA warrant which the deep state was requesting to 'spy' on members of the Trump campaign. The thing is, the article by Michael Isikoff which cited his anonymous source (Christopher Steele - creator of the dossier) was used as evidence to the FISA court to persuade the judges to allow the surveillance warrant.

THE TOPPER IS THAT THE FISA WARRANT WAS A FARCE ANYWAY. THE DEEP STATE WAS ALREADY ILLEGALLY SPYING UPON TRUMP THROUGH AND WITH THEIR FIVE EYES INTELLIGENCE PARTNERS.

THE PURPOSE OF THE FISA WARRANTS WERE NEVER TO SPY ON TRUMP BUT, RATHER, TO CONCEAL THE SOURCE OF THE INTELLIGENCE - FIVE EYES.

>>1146680

Funny, I think just the opposite.

I know that SHE demanded that everyone confirm that she couldn't lose - that her victory was inevitable - but I think the polls were always lying in order to suppress Trump voters.

The rallies broke through the false poll propaganda.

I truly believe the pollsters knew it was at the very least very close.

Further, if you consider that HRC's forces may have stolen multiple states on Election Day then you can entertain the possibility that they actually knew - barring election fraud - that she would lose.

And that would change our entire understanding of the stay behind treason.

>>1146730

The more that is revealed the worse it becomes.

KEK

>>1146732

Using a FISA WARRANT to spy on domestic citizens are legal.

Using FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES to illegally spy on domestic citizens - particularly for domestic political purposes - is definitely unconstitutional, illegal and when doing so to overthrow a duly elected President it is TREASON.

M -ichelle

O -bama

A -?

B -?

>>1146884

Good point

>>1146923

I am