>Not ‘official’ product - 5 Eyes.
>Listen carefully.
>No evidence to support POTUS targeting.
>None.
>Do you understand the gravity of what’s unfolding?
Are you saying that you have no contingency in 'The Plan' for the current state of affairs?
>Not ‘official’ product - 5 Eyes.
>Listen carefully.
>No evidence to support POTUS targeting.
>None.
>Do you understand the gravity of what’s unfolding?
We were led to believe that JA could prove there was no hack but instead was inside job?
>Not ‘official’ product - 5 Eyes.
>Listen carefully.
>No evidence to support POTUS targeting.
>None.
>Do you understand the gravity of what’s unfolding?
And why not petition court for original DNC server to effect IT forensics and prove there was no hack?
If that were the case then SR is witness to no hack and Q would not make the comments that were just dropped.
>Not ‘official’ product - 5 Eyes.
>Listen carefully.
>No evidence to support POTUS targeting.
>None.
>Do you understand the gravity of what’s unfolding?
Ok. So I've totally misread this drop.
No evidence to support POTUS targeting. I thought this meant that there was no way to prove that POTUS is being falsely targeted.
When in reality it means that there is no evidence to justify the Muller Probe.
I feel like a total idiot re my comprehension skills on this.
No evidence to justify Mueller probe means POTUS off the hook.
The gravity of what's unfolding has GRAVE consequences for the Dems!
What a tangled web indeed.