>>11464525 pb

probably yeah,

because W. Bush and his people shut it down immediate with "Sore Loser" chant which was drummed using the large and powerful megaphone of the Mass Media consortium

(as some claim DJT should've done)

BUT

the only reason that strategy worked was separate from any validity that claim may have had.

Questions were shut down, because

W BUSH HAD THE DEEP STATE

AND THE MEDIA BEHIND HIM

if not, he EASILY would've been hounded by the public opinion to back down.

In this case, Trump supporter s/ Trump peopleWILL NOTBACK DOWNand stay quiet if it gets stolen.

Because we have Trump POTUS DJT who is honest

and will stand up with us.

Kerry took a dive for the Deep State

Bernie took a dive

Gore took a dive (he did not challenge. saying to me personally when I met him and questioned him "He didn't want the SCOTUS to appear corrupt. That was a worse result than Bush. However, after the Iraq War began, which is when I ran into him, He said if he had known what Bush would do, and had to do it over, he would've stood up to him.

Only good thing about this stinking case

Bush vs. Gore

is that it now maypossiblybe used to help DJT

"stop the vote count" has precedence

though SCALIA claimed it did not and should not EVER had Precedence. Not sure he can do that, just by making that claim?

Scalia made a special case for W. BUSH

That's how one knew the SCOTUS was corrupt.

It was a arbitrary decision, which fails the test of dispassionate "equal justice under the law"

Law is impartial, same for all

When Sc alia made this decision, his opinion was the lead, he stated plainly that it was a one-off and should never be used again. He wrote that if the vote count were not halted W. Bush would loses his right to be President

Check out the case yourself. I read it and that's what it said

That's why I wasn't sad when Scalia was executed.

He corrupted the SCOTUS

Maybe his acolyte will heal that stain on him

Now that decision B vs. Gore will come back to haunt the Deep State - as it very well should

>>11464921

Gore took a dive (he did not challenge. saying to me personally when I met him and questioned him "He didn't want the SCOTUS to appear corrupt. That was a worse result than Bush. However, after the Iraq War began, which is when I ran into him, He said if he had known what Bush would do, and had to do it over, he would've stood up to him.

Only good thing about this stinking case

Bush vs. Gore

is that it now maypossiblybe used to help DJT

"stop the vote count" has precedence

though SCALIA claimed HIS DECISION did not and should not EVER HAVE THE POWER OF Precedence.

( Not sure he can do that, just by making that claim over his own decision?)

Bush vs. Gore was AN arbitrary decision, which fails the test of dispassionate "equal justice under the law"

THey argued that since some people where unable to have their vote counted that it would be unfair to count others.

It wouldn't be equality.

SO THEY USE OUR RIGHTS AGAINST==US. Which is perfectly "satanic" and actually in itself a Capital Crime

"Under color of law" to take away a citizen's right.

when I met and questioned AL GORE HE CLAIMED He didn't want the SCOTUS to appear corrupt. or to question its validity. He felt that would be bad for the Country. That it's important to have faith in our Institutions.

That was a worse result to HIM SO HE CLAIMED than TO HAVE W. Bush IN THE SEAT OF POWER

. However, after the Iraq War began, which is when I ran into him, THAT TOLD ME THEN if he had known what Bush would do, / WAS GOING TO DO – Lie into War; Iraq War he would've stood up and challenged what they did.

So they all roll over for the Deep State, except for DJT POTUS Trump. And that's why we fight for him because we know our fight will not go to waste.

>>11465153

>>11464921

Maybe they will try to use Bush vs. Gore to shut down the vote count / re-count once Biden has the numbers they want?

>>11465155

actually no