dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: c9e5c1 Nov. 4, 2020, 3:59 p.m. No.11466884 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6899

Not from comms faggot, real anon oldfag, try again

I was one of maybe less than 5 anons who stood on a soapbox and screamed at all you faggots when /cbts/ was comped but you were all too stupid to believe or notice

LONG before Q confirmed

I was banned, ridiculed, etc. but I didn't give a shit, I kept saying what anons needed to hear

>Hey wow look! the banner is being changed every bread, just like I referenced last post

I will do the same now

Any oldfag anon with half a fucking brain can read what I'm saying and know it's 100% true

I don't really give a shit if a combination of shills and useful idiot mid-wits push back

Refute what I'm saying without pivoting to a non sequitur reference of some kind like "muh comms" or "muh OSS" or "muh DOC"

>you can't

>>11466870

If a cooms/mossad baker is in the kitchen, they can rewrite notables and the history, destroying digs.

Not if anons are nominating notables and the baker posts his notable list before the bread ends

<anons nominate notable

<baker adds notable to list

<baker shows notable list to all anons present before moving on

<anyone can go look in bread if baker is accused of editing notables to confirm if they are legit

<can check if notable list matches nominations by CTRL+F "notable"

<history of digs and notables is never lost

who said it was perfect? I'm saying it's how it was always done, and it works a lot better than what we are doing now

I'm only "sliding" in response to being told I was a shill because I only included nominated notables when I baked earlier, instead of just making up my own list

That is because I am an oldfag, and that is how it has always been done

>See something, say something, newfag

It's cute to throw out "newfag" like it earns you some cache but if you argue with me on this point you only expose yourself

Any actual oldfag would validate what I'm saying

Also, you want something to start? If the baker changes the banner every bread, they are a fucking shill

NO ANON would do this. We've made tweaks to it lately but it's the clearest sign of a faggot baker who is trying to fuck with our process and sow doubt.

>>11467192

>redtext CAPS

>28 posts

>keeping very close track of anon bakers post histories across several breads

wow what an organic anon you are

I did have RL shit to do retard, I went to eat dinner with my family

I see you're still spouting bullshit about censoring breads to sow division

Real anons see you glowing from a mile away

>>11467346

>>11467345