>>11468048

So, if these are not super secret ballots and anyone could print them off, what about the fact that both the ballot and stubb must both have the tint and water marks, could these be matched up and who holds the stubbs once the ballots are deposited. surely both will have a number to match up the ballot to the stubb?

''The watermark for the November 3, 2020, General Election, is the CA Poppy. The tint

for the background and watermark is Red PMS 192.

The watermark and tint must appear on the ballot itself, not only on the stub

https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ccrov/pdf/2020/august/20167sl.pdf

>>11468445

playing with hypothetical here, do the ballots have a QR CODE or scan identification?

if so this could be easier to match with the stubb if that also has a barcode?

making it easier to identify a real one from a fake one?

>>11468445

next scenario - what if a foreign ballot design is identified, could that be tracked to disqualify all those ballots duplicated by say china?

>>11468718

Point of the this board is to thrash out the theory;s and then come to a conclusion, think they had time to print the ballots over night? no they must have been printed and stored somewhere all ready, so where and who delivered them, are there cctv avaliable to view the delivery? which states are involved and what polling stations?

>>11468803

thanks anon, confirmed barcode added for identification