Anonymous ID: e47a74 Nov. 4, 2020, 7:43 p.m. No.11470902   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1062

>>11470742

It's sad to see normies get duped by brainlets that don't try to see what the ones that dig deep in to this shit talk about.

A bunch of biblefags that haven't broken the conditioning yet and who can't see the overarching patterns are not people to seek insight from.

 

Mary is the Moon Goddess, Ishtar, Inanna, Semiramis, Ceres, etc.

The "God" of the Old Testament is El/Anu/Chronos and so on. This is distinctly different from the "God" of the New Testament, which Jesus says he was sent by to redeem the fallen children of Light (and Darkness too, obviously).

When "God" gave Woman, the power over the Serpent, "God" was talking about Lilith.

The Serpent is Lucifer, the Light-Bringer, who "God" in the Old Testament wasn't fond of, hence Lucifer being cast out of the Garden. What [They] desperately don't want you to understand is that each version of The Bible is mirrored and that the Light-Bringer reanimates in the second version as "Jesus". This time, "God" is super fond of him and helps him do neat shit.

 

Lucifer is a Latin word. Find out what it means and how it relates in light of the Vigano's letter.

Finally, "virgin" used to mean a woman beholden to no man back in those days, so once you figure out more about linguistic anthropology you start to figure out how you further got duped and you then realize the whole Mary larp shit is just them doing the Lilith bullshit again.

 

Try and learn things some time and quit relying on brainlets that don't actually study all of it to puke in to your skull all of the bullshit propaganda they've sucked up.

Anonymous ID: e47a74 Nov. 4, 2020, 7:55 p.m. No.11471108   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1182

>>11471062

It's no surprise to me that someone would be impotent enough to not even respond to the material and only ever snark over my having the gall to inform those who simply don't know.

Try again and I might not tell you to go fuck yourself this time.

Anonymous ID: e47a74 Nov. 4, 2020, 8:03 p.m. No.11471244   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1324 >>1340

>>11471182

I'm just like you anon. The only difference between us is that the subject at hand has been something that I've spent more time on than you and I've been shown more information than you as a result of showing interest in given subjects.

 

I don't blame you for resisting. You're only doing what you were taught to do.

Soon enough you'll realize your errors and kick yourself for not asking me to elaborate any more.

I wish that day comes sooner rather than later for you.

Anonymous ID: e47a74 Nov. 4, 2020, 8:05 p.m. No.11471279   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1369

>>11471245

>The reason it was the woman was because Christ was not to be born of an earthly father.

<muh virgin birth

Virgin, in those days, simply meant a woman who was not married or not monogamous.

 

Study words people. This isn't hardโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: e47a74 Nov. 4, 2020, 8:10 p.m. No.11471374   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11471324

>Lilith or Lillith is a figure in Jewish mythology, developed earliest in the Babylonian Talmud. From c. AD 700โ€“1000 onwards Lilith appears as Adam's first wife, created at the same time and from the same clay as Adamโ€”compare Genesis 1:27.

Do you enjoy being stupid?โ€ฆ

Reread what I've said with the above in mind.

 

>>11471340

(You) also seem to need to rereaed in light of what's written above.

Lilith is a Talmudic "Goddess", you blabbering brainlet.