>>11471369 lb
I don't know how any of this relates to you not understanding that [they] perpetuated this mistranslation for so long.
Read the Gospel of Mary (which is just one gospel among dozens that you aren't allowed to know about) and you will start to have a fuller grasp of the stories.
Hell, I'm pretty sure we pointed to Roths owning voting machines or their parent company a couple of years ago…
I always laugh when I hear you guys say "counter-insurgency" like we aren't the ones revolting against [their] tyranny.
This is indeed a revolution.
Because you're new here and stupid faggots decided we'd pretend we cared what normies thought so we could reach a wider audience and that that wouldn't come back to bite us once people like (You) showed up.
If you haven't figured out what "the Jews" are have done and have been up to just yet then you're in for one long ass ride, anon.
Just remember, they aren't really "Jews".
So I'm wrong but you already know what I'm talking about?…
You always contradict yourself so hard and then just try to gaslight me in to shutting up.
How have you not figured out that will never work yet?
Besides, I'm not out of my league. You've already admitted that. Remember?
I used to respect you, you know?
These days you just feed in to the feedback loop that normies carry with them here. You just seem like a larp that does nothing but obstruct our explaining things to normies.
You seem like a larp designed to gatekeep knowledge from them.
This just sounds like jesuit pilpul.
Your circular jesuit "logic" will only last so long. Once normies learn to think for themselves again, they'll realize that all of the patterns converge at specific points and they'll begin to paint the picture from there.
I make no claim that mary "wasn't a virgin". I don't really know for sure. I do know, however, that that word used to mean "not beholden to a man".
This was a feeble attempt.
This was a good explanation that I think most anons/normies need to hear.
Granted, I'd say the vast majority of those whining are not organic.
I'll readily admit I've been wrong about things before, but maybe I'm just being idealistic when I imagine that the majority that's complaining so much isn't organic. I'd like to think that if you spent three years here, you're willing to ride out the obviousness that is the pending contested election.
It seems like it was such an obvious move and HRC even said this would happen. I could have told you literally ten months ago now that [they] would push for the mail-in votes and that this was the result.
Hell, I could post screencaps of me talking about it then, but I'm going to maintain my anonymity.
See, the phrasing alone makes me think that you're just so indebted to the dogma that binds you.
This place will not be kind to you. Your grandiose phrasing cannot substitute genuine insight provided to you by actually doing the research to piece the puzzle(s) together.
Go bible puke somewhere else, brainlet.
>pray you never find out why [my] function is necessary.
You don't think I already know why?
I'm not wasting my time. I have no other way to spend it at this point and, again, if you haven't figured that out yet, you seem like you're wasting your our time giving me any more (You)s.
Genies don't stay in bottles forever.
I won't continue affording you my reluctance much longer.
Still doing the "you've got a demon in you, anon" bit, aren't you?
Isn't that a bit redundant? None of us are alone in these things.
It still makes me laugh that you poke me and when I poke you back you talk about glass houses… It's almost like there's a pattern with you.
Privacy and secrecy are two different things.
>who verifies ledgers of blockchains?
It's built in to the tech, anon. That's the point of it being trustless. There's no human checks anymore and the checks are automatic. If problems arise, the fault lies at the feet of the ones that programmed it.
Not only do you not have any idea how prevalent "AI" is, you seem to have spiraled out in to some fantastical idea about how blockchain works due to sheer ignorance.
If it's done right, it will be open source and all people have to do is find someone that's capable of fixing it.
This?