>>11473132

Anon, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but nothing is going to happen. I remember all election years, and always one of the candidates demanded a recount and check for voter fraud. And yes, they did found cheating, but in most cases it only made a difference of approx. 10,000 votes. Since Biden and Trump have a great interval between each other right now, it's impossible for Trump to win this election. Not by legal means at least. The system is too corrupt. And a Supreme Court decision doesn't automatically guarantee winning the election.

The only way is to finally stand up and fight. Not with words, but by actions. If you stand by and just watch, nothing is going to change. But if you stand up, arm yourselves, group with each other, we might actually be able to finally overcome this old system.

>>11473245

Here's what's going to happen:

>Trump demands recounts in key states, such like MI, WI, etc.

>SC will agree and recount will happen

>SC will discover that a lot of mail-in ballots were made by people not legitimized to vote (not having the voting age, not following the deadline, etc)

>Approx. could change the count by 50,000 - 100,000 votes

>However it won't be enough to make a difference. It's possible that Trump might be able to win one state back, where the difference between Biden and Trump is very low, but if it's higher than 100,000, it's pretty much impossible for Trump to win back a key state.

All in all, I can say it's pretty much impossible for Trump to win back the re-election just by the SC. That's incredibly rare to happen. The only time where it worked was in 2000, Bush v. Gore. But that was a very special situation. Bush won Florida, but a recount of the votes was in favor of Al Gore. The SC decision stopped/nullified the recount, and thus it had Bush win the election. But again, that was a rare exception. It all was about Florida to win the election. But Trump, here, would have to sue a long time to win back 4 key states in order to actually have a decent chance again.

>>11473580

He was right. But I doubt that he can go against it. Every candidate in the past elections demanded recounts, went to SC to sue, and they always lost. How can we be sure it will be different this time?

>>11473625

It actually doesn't. The election is over. But there are still people voting. This doesn't make sense at all. Election is on Election Day, not two, three or four days after, faggot.