Some court could, yes. The rule is that if the number of "indeterminate" ballots or votes exceed the margin of victory, then the result of the contest is not valid.
"Indeterminate" could be ballots known to be for the cheating team, or ballots not meeting rules but also not known for sure to be one way or the other, etc.
There are cases of elections ruled invalid, and the US constitution provides more than one way to deal with the case when a state's return is not available or is not trusted.
FWIW, PA used "covid" as the excuse that R's could not get close enough to D's to see D's evaluating ballots.
Yeah, but that is trivially true in case of vote fraud, and even the use of legal process to steal an election (Ted Stevens).
Funny thing is, even when you SHOW, the crooks persist in denial. Tammany Hall and Boss Tweed are not accounts of fiction; and we are presently in the same sort of realm but a thousand times bigger when it comes to election "integrity."
Yep. At rock bottom, society boils down to credible ability and will to use force.
Our government has long rejected the principle that it (the government) answers to the people. The people have demonstrated they are unwilling to use force.
The sick thing is that the truly powerful PREFER war, the bigger the better, and no sides taken - they make money off winner and loser alike. Not about political system, not about political party, not about race.
They want us dead.