>>11476796

>Hmmm…….repost nb for moar eyes

BALLOT PRINT ANOMALY - New Mexico

There's no sauce for this, just my eye witnesses, i.e. challengers. I'm hoping some other anons around here are working the elections in their areas and can talk to the challengers.

1. Challenger #1 reported that the printers used to print ballots were printing the circles that need to be bubbled in, the voters could barely see them. Many of the older folks needed to ask poll worker staff for help filling out their ballots because they couldn't see the bubbles.

This location was illegally staffed by 3 Dems, 1 Rep. poll worker.

At one point, when the voter bubbled in the wrong bubble because he couldn't see well, the precinct judge took out an eraser and ERASED the choice made with a FELT MARKER!! Voter then continued making choices.

1. Challenger #2 reported that the clerk's office told the challenger on the first day that those FELT MARKERS were required; no other pens could be used.

1. Challenger #3 reported at another voting convenience center that on election day only, the printer there also started printing the circles so light many voters couldn't see the circles.

1. This anon is in charge of challengers locally. I also noticed the circles were difficult to see, but am still young enough that I didn't need help.

(FYI people with cataracts need more light to see. Printing feint circles affects older people more than young people. Ask a poll worker for help, how do you know they are pointing at the right place on the paper?)

Seeing posts about the paper and watermarks and was wondering if any of this ties in to feintly printed circles.

Any anons have any thoughts?

I was wondering…………..

Could the ballots actually have used a special kind of ink that the ballot tabulator scanner picked up on.

Could the ballot printing machine be programmed to print the circles light if the voter is a REP?

Could the scanner be programmed to swap voter choices from REP to DEM if the bubbles are feintly printed?

The odds of recounts are low.

There are automatic hand recounts in our state if the percentage of difference between candidates is below a certain threshold and the state pays for it. But if a larger threshold, then the candidate wishing to challenge the outcome has to pay for the recount… big $$$$.

Any computer programmerFAGS around?

Is this scenario possible?

>>11477642

But the ballot tabulator machines are not online. At least not in my state.

Now auditing to make sure the pre-programmed software inside the ballot tabulators is tabulating correctly is 100% spot on.

Which six states have that deployed?