>>11481437 lb
All of that symbolism was relevant to humanity as a whole long before "Jews" tricked you in to not deciphering it and just writing it off as "bad guy stuff".
Democracy is faggot anyway.
It matters how you use the experience though.
Maybe one day you'll actually be helpful and stop being so prickly…
You can be as right as you want anon, but that doesn't make what I said untrue.
"Jews" do not own the symbolism or the knowledge being signaled in using it.
Understanding that you've been coaxed in to writing it off is very valuable.
It helps to explain the knowledge that inspires the symbolism and that it doesn't belong to any particular group or person.
What you're doing is is saturating normies' comprehension and I don't see how it's very helpful, especially in comparison to what I'm proposing.
Every time I try to get you to quit being nihilistic and just help me explain more instead of getting all apathetic and reluctant, you bend this back on "that's not important right now" and then you move the goal posts of "knowing" further away from normies and their reach.
Why even be here or interact with me if you don't want to help?
We waste too much time contending each other. Wouldn't it be a lot easier to just explain things to them than refrain and get all high and mighty when I press you to stop holding back?
You seem absurdly confused and although I'd prefer to think you've got the right intentions, you still just seem like a moran larping up until I say something naughty, which seems to prompt you to hold me back.
It might be your birthday, anon, but you do have to share the cake.
>But the overall of them has been used for dark, occultic things
I enjoyed everything else you said.
Besides, I don't mean to argue. Maybe my issue is the connotation though, because friction is important here.
The vast majority of symbolism is intent-agnostic and it doesn't care who wields it.
Once anons and normies can part ways with the dichotomous thought patterns granted to them by [them], we can make genuine progress.
Doing other things like getting distracted with the script of this act in the Movie seems pointless. Priming anons and normies can do wonders for quickening the pace.
This "that's too fast for normies/anons" diatribe seems like pointless friction and those of you holding back to save face or pretend that normies/anons can't handle it are doing all of us a disservice.
very interesting, anon.
Sure, not specifically what anon communicated, but the frame anon's using is what seems like it could be valuable.
>Youve gotta remember with who you are speaking, though
True. I think it's helpful if some of us are impatient though. I don't mind being made an example, anon. I think it can only help all of us.
FWIW, I do try to practice patience and humility though, as I think we all should.
Not letting anons stagnate seems like an imperative from my perspective. Maybe that's all the more specific things should get…
This kind of shit happens frequently when we start talking about naughty subjects, in case you haven't noticed yet.
I wonder what the etymology of the word "apocalypse" means…
In reality, we shouldn't always agree about everything. My biggest gripe is you holding back and holding me back - that's essentially the extent of it.
I guess I can only want you to try harder so much, but it doesn't mean I'm not going to stop wanting it.
Which is exactly why I don't regard resistance from other anons very highly.
Once you fully understand that the ceiling cannot be breached until the mean is expanded, things become an overbearing imperative, at least in my experience.
I'd feel like I failed if I didn't provoke as many as possible in to thinking harder and maybe I'm flailing about because I want to avoid that.
true if big