Baker
It is spelled "Riyadh," not "Riyaad."
>>1148575 Chinagate - HRC scandal from the 1990s
Baker Notable
It was one of those strange bullet-shaped fragments that abound when planes disintegrate
that must have hit him. Happens all the time (around the Clinton crime family, anyway).
Was thinking about "Watch the water."
What is special about water? It always seeks its own level. From answers.com, the accepted answer
is: "It is not an idiom, it is fact. A hose can be used for a water level with hundreds of feet
between the two points. As long as two bodies of water are connected somehow, they will be
at the same level. As an idiom, it would mean '''a person tends to seek out people they feel
are equal or have the same point of view.'''"
So, by "Watch the Water," does Q mean to watch who hangs out with known bad actors?
Do we know them by the company they keep? Is this our way of finding those who are more
circumspect in their deallings?
Just random thoughts percolating to the surface…
You really cannot be that stupid, can you? How do you breathe when you are asleep?
I keep seeing anons saying things like, "I can't understand why POTUS attacked Syria."
POTUS did not attack Syria. He took out a cabal-owned chemical weapons factory. He bombed
Hezballah. He took out some Iranian Revolutionary Guards. None of the targets were
Syrian, and that's why neither Syria nor Russia tried to shoot down any of the missiles.
It was an attack on Iran and the Cabal, not Syria.
Back in the 1950s and 1960s, if the government came out with a study, the figures were considered
indisputable. Government studies were sacrosanct. If a government study said something,
it was the last word on the matter. Point proven.
Fast forward to the 1970s. The cabal has been infiltrating the media and the government for 20
years. They are high-placed enough now to start putting their darling followers into positions
of power early in their careers. Late-20-somethings who will become "future leaders" in
the 1990s. Then, they will yield real power and their edicts will be backed by impeccable sources.
Anons, I give you the Clintons and Global Warming… Those are just two very visible examples
of what I have mentioned in the introduction.