>>11491577
I think you meant to tag me, but you're still just stretching it way too far.
Yes, that'd drooling shill talk.
Gates wasn't the only one to develop the biological interaction with digital currencies, but, frankly, I don't know enough about the general topic to explain why you're a brainlet for caring about it so soon.
Yes, I'm sure the faggot has something sinister in mind for that shit, but just becuse he sees that it can be a lucrative idea doesn't necessarily mean it's evil.
But, I get that you're too lazy to understand more about it. I hope you don't spend all of your money on rope.