Anonymous ID: 31a7ee Nov. 5, 2020, 8:30 p.m. No.11492428   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Note to any mid level DNC shlubs that are lurking…which is pretty much all of you since they didn’t bother giving Joe a real team.

 

FIRST TO SQUEAL GETS THE DEAL.

 

The rest after that? They get an exciting new dating life.

Anonymous ID: 31a7ee Nov. 5, 2020, 9:37 p.m. No.11493657   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3752 >>3770 >>4163

There are a few videos out there that are gonna backfire on us.

 

Although this looks shady and certainly could be abused without both parties watching, it’s not fraud.

 

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/this-video-is-going-viral-but-its-not-voter-fraud/

Anonymous ID: 31a7ee Nov. 5, 2020, 9:53 p.m. No.11493908   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3925

>>11493752

I don’t dispute that the process of what I’m hearing is called ‘recreating’ damaged ballots wouldn’t be ripe for abuse.

With the lack of GOP oversight being permitted, yeah…it would be exploited.

It just pointed out that this article is trying to head off our side calling out what might be legal.

 

The more pressing question in my mind is why are there sooo many ballots damaged and requiring ‘recreation’?

Anonymous ID: 31a7ee Nov. 5, 2020, 9:59 p.m. No.11493972   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11493925

Agree. It’s not a good look in combination with the other factors such as R’s not being able to observe and the count room windows being walled off and covered.