I see a few way that this can go down:

1. Trump wins PA, GA, NC, etc → clean win, Trump remains POTUS

2. Biden's people succeed in stealing enough states to win, lawfare and recounts prevail → Trump remain POTUS

3. Lawfare and recounts fail, the FBI reveals the sting operation. State legislatures, faced with overwhelming and damning evidence of fraud, vote to give it to Trump (they can do that y'know) → Trump remain POTUS

4. State legislatures are unmoved, Biden retains his ill gotten electoral votes, Mil intercedes and suspends the constitution, temporary junta is established → Trump takes a few months off to play golf while those who asked to to run long ago sort things out.

Scenario 1 seems unlikely to me. Everything needs to go right. Scenario 2 seems similarly unlikely. The baddies have home field advantage. I think 3 is the most likely. I's the perfect setup for future election security measures. And it depends only (almost) in things within our guys' control. Scenario 4… would do a lot of damage to the country, but may be necessary to enable the military tribunals we've been told is coming.

>>11492065

>where are Biden's lawyers?

>are they not challenging any state anywhere?

What state would they challenge?

>>11492155

>Is the right fucking bread, God damnit?!

Whichever one you like is the correct bread. I suggest going where the baker isn't a childish asshole.

>>11492220

>>11492264

>>11491932

Nah, that's just bleed through from printing on the other side.

>>11492441

>Ignore OSS, he diss's every baker.

Except for his pals BK and Lolibaker. They've formed a clique. Watch for the three-triangle secret handshake, sorta like:

▲

▲ ▲

>>11492535

Well that failed. Picture the three triangles forming another triangle.

>>11492555

>I doubt all ballots were printed at the same facility.

Probably not all at one facility. But there are only a small number that do high-security printing for elections.

>>11492579

All we really know is from this Q post. I think I may have started a rumor by accident a few weeks ago when I offhandedly opined about what I would do with secret additives at ballot printers that the states didn't specify, don't know about, and couldn't inform foreign conspirators of. Everyone went nuts, started talking about having people with access to real ballots check with UV lights.

>>11492830

Dayum

>>11492864

But CNN told me there is no evidence of election fraud!!!

>>11493047

>I am in a city and it has been freaky ass quiet as fuck

Kek. Just wait until the legislature throws out the election results after receiving a presentation from the DHS and FBI.

>>11493143

>Oh, Kermie! NOW you know WHY the bug-zapper is off limits.

Have you ever peed on a electric-fence post?