Anonymous ID: e16f8e Nov. 5, 2020, 9:48 p.m. No.11493822   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3848 >>3882

>>11493677

I was thinking about this tonight. So bear with a little rambling analysis. We need to return to a two-party system. We need to refocus our country on policy debate. One component of that return could be savvy infiltration. A moderate democratic woman with the cajones to swear at Nancy Pelosi? Yes please, I'll take one of those. Democrats are not our natural enemies. Corrupt, self-serving, compromised, black-mailing, anti-American, extremist lunatic Marxists are a cancer that need to be removed. Completely. But you can't remove without providing a decent, believable reasonable replacement. Ex-CIA, why not? So there's an idea.

Anonymous ID: e16f8e Nov. 5, 2020, 9:52 p.m. No.11493892   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3899

>>11493848

It's slow with 3 breads, so I'll bite.

What is plame?

I am a newfag, but patriot who has read the Counterinsurrgency Manual and thinks deeply about the whys of this 'movement'

Anonymous ID: e16f8e Nov. 5, 2020, 10:01 p.m. No.11493995   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11493899

Got it, sorry I was referring to Spanberger in my little rift on the purpose of floating

moderate Democratic Candidates as a part of the effort to restore some sanity to our two-party system. And I will add, I have another theory that the number of veterans who are running for public office is a reflection of an internal military policy to encourage some of the "stars" who could continue to rise within the ranks to apply their talents in service to our country in the Legislative Branch. Seeing that we are in a Cold War, it makes sense to me that the leadership through career development and counseling could inspire these talented veterans to serve with equal valor and sacrifice through public office.