Jan 20 is inauguration. There are a few benchmark deadlines on the way.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/chapter-1
3 U.S. Code Chapter 1 - Presidential Elections
All that is based on a few fundamental premise, and I'm not sure any of them exists.
That there would be a media report other than "cheating by POTUS"
That the public would understand the explanation that connects the evidence to the conclusion
That the system of counting ballots and litigating close or challenged contests has a shred of integrity
That enough of the public has a shred of integrity
>>11496227 Posted this last night, but guess anons didn't process that theis is a blockchain technology WATERMARK. There is a PATENT on it, which means it is a secret.
Other than classified info, like nuclear bomb technology (yet, there are business competitors) patents are by definition public. "Has a patent = secret" is bullshit, and you are spreading a lie with this. Not helpful. Patent Agent anon, J.D. too,
Just remember that the people of Mexico, China and Venezuela know the nature of their government, and by and large putter through life just the same. Anybody who thought the US government and institutions were any different, less corrupt, or whatever is a fucking moron. Just saying, what we are seeing more clearly now, is the way it is and has been for all of your life.
SCOTUS is unreliable. It is a failed institution too. There mere threat of "packing" is enough to make it do your bidding. No need to threaten with physical harm or takeaway of comfy bennies.
It's always up to the people. The institutions have proven incapable at best. I think they are literally harmful.