>>11495036

Pb

From previously posted article https://www.npr.org/2020/05/03/848347895/ballot-printers-increase-capacity-to-prepare-for-mail-voting-surge

Looks like states print their own and i agree, they have access to valid ballots, they are just filling them in as needed to win. This whole watermarked thing is a LARP. The only way to prove the fraud is video, witness, or some other physical evidence other than authenticity of the ballots. They are using real ballots, but dead people or non citizens or felons, or just people that didnt vote. They are filling out their ballots and submitting them as real.

>>11495907

Not if they just check their names off in the voter rolls as checked in as in person or in their tracking system they just falsify the database. Easy to do if they control everything already. We all know they are cheating but i highly doubt its provable by watermarks is my point.

>>11495929

Except didnt the SECDEF just resign? Not a good sign. My thought is Trump put him in charge of safeguarding the election and he failed. Whether purposefully ot not, he failed and resigned.

>>11495940

Yes but read my earlier pic showing that some election officials print their own ballots. They dont all go through third party. If they control the election office, they control it all.

>>11495963

Yes they “could”. But i dont believe that one vendor printed every ballot in the country.

>>11495980

In my state i dont sign anything. I walk up to the polling place say my name and address, and they check off a box next ti my name and hand me a ballot. I fill it out and put it into the counting machine. Completely anonymous ballots that cant be tied back to anyone, with just a checkmark next to my name. No way to check if i voted unless you have the book. So after polls close… they check off all the ones that were not previosuly checked and fill out ballots for them. This is how they do it.

>>11496009

Yes it was allowed because the dems that controlled rhe election offices allowed it.

>>11496061

I dont think you get it. Say Jane Doe is a registered voter. She cant make it to the polls to vote since shes at work, or just doesnt even care or want to vote. Polls close. Her name is listed in the book since she is a registered voter, but no checkmark next to her name means she didnt vote. If i am the corrupt election official and need more votes for Biden, i check off her name and fill out a ballot for her and put it in the machine. No way to tell what ballot is “hers” since its anonymous, nobody signed anything and she wouldnt even know she “voted”. Nobody would be abke to tell she never showed up to go and ask her to sign an affidavit. She doesnt know she “voted” and nobody can tell from the book she was never there. There is not reason to ever doubt that she wasnt there from a third persons perspective.

>>11496150

No, my point is why would the FBI show up to her house? Are they literally going to go to every single house to get an affidavit that you voted or not? She doesnt know she “voted”, and anyone looking at the voter logs cant tell she wasnt really there.

>>11496165

You dont get it. There is no date or time in the log, literally a checkmark. Thats it. There is no way to tell who from the log the FBI should visit in your scenario unless they visit every single voter.

>>11496181

Who is everyone? You cant check status online in my state. I certainly dont have access to the voter logs. She will never know there was a fraudulent vote in her name. Nobody else can tell its fraudulent, you are obviously trolling me at this point. I very much want the fraud to be exposed but i am highly doubtful unless there are emails and phone call recording of the people planning this massive fraud.

>>11496205

And what if 1 million people voted in that log? How do you know which ones to ask? Can you have the FBI visit one million people and get one million affidavits in 10 days?

>>11496576

Yeah and they do nothing but fail at writing procedures. I still believe Q is real but they have lost control. The only way to save it is if they have hard evidence of phone calls or emails about dem plans to steal the votes.