bruh it's probably from the gore anon getting banned
Part 1
MicrosoftAnon here. Going to tell you a story.
I've always dropped items in the past with plenty of sauce so you guys know me by now and that I'm trustworthy and that I don't post often enough, but when I post it's genuine. And yes I use TOR because I still have things to lose and wish to remain anon at this time.
This story doesn't provide a lot of sauce, but what I'm about to tell you I believe is true. I believe the digital watermark on the ballots is true.
Some of you out there may be questioning saying "I do audits and paper trails all the time, I don't see how this could be done. The ballots were not printed in a centralized location at homeland so how could they of? Well I'm here to tell you how they could have done it.
You may remember in December of 2016 post elections an article came out about the Georgia Voting office being hacked by Homeland Security. See Sauce:
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/georgia-claims-homeland-security-hack-election-systems-article-1.2903817
Well I was working for a big tech company which you may be able to guess, and happened for however reason. Maybe God put me in line out of a slew of engineers to assist Georgia with their issue so I can tell this story today? But whatever reason, I feel compelled to tell this to you anons to bolster your spirits and I think you should know.
I have told some anons this story in passing awhile ago and I had a good anon friend who told me he does auditing and paper trails all the time and said there's no way homeland could have printed those ballots with watermarks. That got me thinking. Is there a way? Then I remembered their attempt to hack Georgia, which I had a part in thwarting homelands attempt. For the record, I was doing my job, A voting office called us and needed assistance to stop an active hacking attempt. I did my job, and I did it well. Perhaps too well. I got on, traced the IP info back and sure as shit, it was homeland security. They were sloppy. They were caught. The Georgia Admin who was a competent admin, and I don't say that often regarding government administrators as has been my experience working with many of them over time. (No offense to govAdminAnons), but this one was and told me that 3 months prior "That homeland security came to him and asked to install security software on their machines." To which this admin denied the request because he felt he was competent and wanted full control over his systems. He didn't trust Homeland. And personally at the time, I didn't trust homeland either.
I have seen misdeeds over time by them and quite frankly there are plenty of reasons not to trust the government even now with the way the FBI has dropped the ball on investigations, sitting on them without prosecutions. (Still waiting on Weiner laptop reveal). Homeland under Obama wasn't the greatest, and this was still fresh, Trump had won but hadn't even taken office yet to give you an idea of the situation of what the feeling was like at the time as you can imagine. So why would I suddenly trust them when I single handedly caught them breaking into a Voting Office? What was I to think at the time? What would you assume? They were hacking a voting office. It was wrong, even if for the right reasons to protect the elections. I know you would not have thought, maybe they were trying to secure 2020 elections. You would be more likely to think maybe they are installing malware to manipulate the vote in 2020. After all they were literally brute forcing their way into a Voting Office. That's not a legit way to do something. So I do not hold myself at fault for possibly throwing a wrench into the system of catching the deep state in the 2020 elections. How could I of known? How could anyone of known?
Part 2 in a second.
Part 2 continued…
Now that being said. We know homeland was going around to voting offices asking to install "Security" software to harden the vote. Of course they never said what their software did, but think logically. What is likely? Could the software they installed include a digital watermark or contain firmware for local printers which already have the capability to put watermarks on paper, even your home printers do this for identification purposes, but what if they installed a special watermark on all the ballot printing printers that would be identifiable and un-reproducable and this was the purpose of the security software. They knew election fraud has been taking place. Homeland wanted to do something about it. They couldn't tell anyone, it would ruin the security of it. Well the cat is out of the bag now, and people are onto it, so for me it's safe to tell this story now.
Now fast forward 4 years later, here we are today. We are hearing rumor of digital water marks being put onto the ballots. And now you have a backstory. Now I know what homeland was likely up to. I don't have 100% proof positive of these results, nor am I claiming this was what was done, but it is a definite possible way it could have been installed onto them. Plus you now have some history into that story and why they may have attempted to install.
If this was the true intent of Homeland Security, I want to formally apologize to them for stopping them in their attempt to secure the elections. I'm sure they will read this, but they must know that good people may stop them if they use underhanded methods to get their deeds done as good people are everywhere so I'm sure they understand as I understand as well. When you operate in the shadows, even as a white hat, there is collateral damage at times.
On another note. I only stopped it happening in the state of Georgia. I have no idea, but assume Homeland didn't just give up in Georgia, but if they did give up, then it's only Georgia's ballots that will not have the watermark, but every other state does have them. If it turns out they do have the watermark then this means homeland tried again and were successful. There are plenty of other states which I happen to know fact did take the homeland security software package, and I'm 100% sure the deep state have been caught red handed, and Trump is about to bring about pain like never seen during an election, and I cannot wait for it!
God Bless Anons, God Bless America, God Bless the World, and God Wins!
MA
To Beanz,
Beanz, I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding between yourself and Anons. You say Q has made us complacent, and to some degree that is temporarily true, but to frame it as a failure of the plan or to denigrate Anons for trusting the plan is tasteless.
See Tracy, we autists have this understanding of the world that clashes with the 'normies' understanding of the world. As a group we are disenfranchized from the normie world, we have no loyalty to the status quo, we have no loyalty to tradition and dogma outside of our humble circles. As such, we did not give a fuck to save YOUR world until late October 2017 when Q came by and asked us to trust our President and give the idea of American Exceptionalism another opportunity to resonate with our souls. Thankfully, for many of us, we wanted to believe everything we grew up being told was true, we wanted our birthright back more than we wanted the destruction of YOUR world. So we worked.
But make no mistake. POTUS, God bless him, God bless his team, and God bless everyone who supports him; is not our last chance. POTUS is their last chance at a merciful and just end to their reign of terror. Over the last 3 years Anons have mobilized their social circles, cleaned their guns, and watched in earnest the battle for this Country and the souls of it's citizens. Half the reason there's so much friction for the dems over the theft of this election is because of our efforts to move the Overton Window and make it socially acceptable to disbelieve the narrative. The fact you think we're complacent because we won't go make ourselves easy targets for Antifa in the streets speaks VOLUMES about how successful we've been at empowering people like you by providing an environment where YOUR VOICE is listened to by a society that, let's be honest here, has shunned you just as much as it's shunned us.
Back to the original point, our so called complacency. It's not complacent to wait on invoking "We, The People" and killing the traitors in the streets. This action is suggested, nay, demanded by our Constitution and many Patriots are willing to answer that call should POTUS and Q fail or ask. If POTUS want's us to take the streets, we will, but until then we are not your personal Army and maybe you should go back to persuading normies instead of talking trash to patient Anons that are ready to wipe our enemies off the face of the earth.
There are monsters lurking here just waiting to serve God. Check yourself before you wreck yourself. Go in Peace with God, we have no qualm with you.
What the actual fuck has happened to this place? Comments from anons are now considered notable? I wouldn't blame Q team for not coming back here as the commitment to actual research has clearly fallen off. To the real anons, stay the course and keep your heads up. To the rest of you shill fucks and comped bakers, be sure to choke on a giant, festering freighter of dicks.