Anons, do you understand how DNA evidence works? DNA is never 100% conclusive…there is a statistical probability applied to DNA evidence. Example, DNA might show that your biological child has a 1 in 3 Trillion chance of not being your biological child. You can't mount a credible defense that it's not your child because "there's a slight chance". Same with any data.
Info is emerging related to the many statistical anomalies in these contested states, including DJT Jr twat about a massive number of late ballots with single dots for Biden. Any entry level data scientist can prove the statistical impossibility of this occurring. And I would put money on the fact that the fraudsters made many mistakes and left some gaping holes. Beyond the shadow of a doubt doesn't mean 100% (0 in 3 Trillion), and the legal process has to accept what the data says using the preponderance of evidence standard. Beyond the shadow of a doubt doesn't mean 100%, and And I believe that the evidence about to come forward will be well beyond just the math.
Folks, this is about to get very interesting. So while you are stocking up on scotch and ammo, pick up some popcorn.