pb notable >>11505994 Watch this David Steele discussion with Charlie Ward. It's from August 7th, but very interesting.
great stuff from 8 min on, (maybe earlier).
BUT at 10 MIN- They talk Q origins. 1962 WH under JFK?
pb notable >>11505994 Watch this David Steele discussion with Charlie Ward. It's from August 7th, but very interesting.
great stuff from 8 min on, (maybe earlier).
BUT at 10 MIN- They talk Q origins. 1962 WH under JFK?
ty anon!
>but many do not see the truth…they are so brainwashed and its just not worth the battle or damage it would do to the relationships that would happen to argue with them. Plus they use my PTSD against me in those cases…
polish your skills of persuasion and reading people and knowing and reading people in terms of getting what you want from people accomplished.
you want to share the truth and that can involve positive manipulation, it is a sales job and involve much moar than telling people the truth.
i red pilled my mum to support potus with one thing over 2 years, sharing articles and public data of his religious support and pro-abortion stance.
red pilling is not a situation (especially with one you love) of showing factual data and forcing them to accept it as real, you first need to understand them, the audience and tailor a strategy, which may be long term as in years.
You must show them, as Q says, and often they have to be shown many times.
In some respects a persons passion and strong beliefs in something dimishes the credibility of the message, especially with family, and the natural tendency/belief is that a close relationship should increase credibility when your belief is strong– BUT that is not how things are programmed.
keep up the work and good luck.
>would this give a signature to the origin of the ballot?
could be paper contains moisture and i would guess it could be easy to add a elemental/chem array to water during processing.
could be as simple as a certain mineral concentration that is not naturally occuring.
for instance with the water during processing start with a elemental mix/ration that through to end result will yield a definitive and measurable ration. lets say 5 ppm Fe, 10 ppm Sn, 20ppm Na, so the ballot paper can be tested and sodium should be 4x iron and 2x tin type of thingy.
adjust for absorbtion, chemical transfer (with air) and surfactants and a chemist could easily come up with a plan.
watch the water elemental composition of ballots