>>1150868
It wasn't you, your question didn't line up with post info that needed to be posted.
>>1150868
It wasn't you, your question didn't line up with post info that needed to be posted.
There isn't anything on the [01 MIN] 3/7 line?
On line [00 MIN] 3/6 is from a Q post 10/31 with a 00 MIN time stamp. Did you mean a different day & time?
I'll be sure not to post when your around or you can wait till I'm finished cleaning up my graphics making new ones, that spider web clock date graphic I posted wasn't my 1st try. Give me a break I'm not a graphics fag as much as I'd love to be a pro at these.
I've experimented with the min time stamp making multiples of the same time stamp, because of the graphic Q posted I believe it was an example to not include Anon posts with the same min time stamp as the Q posts.
Not tweets, its Q posts & time stamps lining up with certain dates, but feel free to ignore & keep your eyes only on twitter.