>>11509172 (pb)
#2599 is even more problematic, as those are not bakers (medical staff), and it's not a pepe: it's the medical facility's logo, which has been id'ed a few breads ago
That's assuming (enough) justices aren't already so captured/compromised by dems, they'll rather just go by their capturers, than by their oath, something thst, at this point, should be seriously taken into consideration.