regarding:

>>https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11511720.html#11512419 (PB)

Notables about Kary Mullis (nobel prize laureate for invention of Polymerase Chain Reaction Process (it isNOT A TESTit is a tool)

PCR doesn't work because it is NOT a TEST for anydisease or disease organism including viral

It merely makes xerox copies (so to speak) of small bits of RNA or DNA

so that THOSE copies may be studied.

MORE THAN 95% of HUMAN DNA HAS BEEN TERMED VIRAL

In fact (since the HIV FRAUD) NO VIRUS is isolated using previously ACCEPTED classical virology protocol. (KOCH's Postulates) it is onlyINFERREDby the presence of an innocent (and VITAL) enzyme called RT orreverse transcriptase

WHY? Why would scientists believe the presence of this enzyme INFERS VIRAL ACTIVITY??

Because: In the early 1970s in the "BIBLE" of microbiology it is written: DNA isonly TRANSCRIBED ONE WAY

and in fact RT allows it to be transcribedBACKWARDS

so an IDIOT named Robert GALLO (the Fraud who claimed to discover HIV but really simplyRENAMEDa previous LAB ARTEFACT (i.e. read: SLOPPY LABWORK) which he previously made the mistake of claiming was the cause cause of Human T-Cell Lymphoma and hence: HTLV or Human T-Cell LYMPHOMA VIRUS… was laughed (temporarily) out of the halls of science by his much brighter PEERS. So, having a BONE to pick he simply waited for the right moment, STOLE the sample from Luc Montagnier of Pasteur institute and renamed it from: HTLV = to the new: HIV and VOILA! He had (through sleight of hand) produced the FIRST virus ever to be pronounced by Press secretary (Margaret Heckler of Human Health services a division of the NIH) rather than Peer Review. It was immediately accepted without publicly aired question while behind the scenes massive numbers of SHOCKED Scientist and Virologists protested and lost their license to practice or their grants or funding for research for questioning the NEW Virology paradigm…

This has been the state of Virology ever since.

In fact: The enzyme Reverse Transcriptase is a healing and repair mechanism for our DNA. And is NOT the product of a virus. (Gallo even admitted this fact in 1973 long ago when he stated that RT was found in cells that had NOT BEEN damaged by exogenous PHA (look for the words: STIMULATED but not UNSTIMULATED in the graphic). In otherwords. RT was found in undamaged perfectly healthy cells after THEY WERE DAMAGED even if they were otherwise healthy. It repairs DNA by reverse transcribing that code back into DNA from RNA.

Most people do not realize that Microbiologists say that over 90% of the Human Genome is comprised of so called JUNK …or VIRAL DNA/RNA.

Yes. So if you built a test to test for all of that RNA you would find that we are overloaded with millions of VIRI.

So why is finding the presence of a small SNIPPET of the RNA sequence of ONE SUCH VIRUS somehowproofthat you are infected by it?

Anymore than finding the presence of ANY of the other VIRI which make up 90% of the human genome???

ANSWER: It doesn't.

Finding a virus in a location in your body (IF IT IS INDEED A VIRUS AND WE HAVE NO PROOF OF THAT)

is not the same thing as FINDING an INFECTION by that virus.

If that's what it meant then we are infected by millions of viri and we should all be dead already.

But that's not what it means.

It simply means we found some RNA. And so far they haven't even proven it's VIRAL nor that it causes DISEASE much less that finding it means there is the presence of a PATHOLOGY (or infection). And even if an infection were present there is NO WAY to TIE that particular RNA finding to theCAUSE of the INFECTION

THIS IS WHY PCR is incapable OF TESTING FOR ANY KIND OF INFECTION

it doesn't TEST for infection. It finds RNA.

and even if there IS an infection there is NO CAPABILITY TO IDENTIFY THAT THE RNA FOUND HAS ANY CONNECTION TO THE INFECTION.

period