I'm just going over numbers looking at trends. It seems like every couple of terms we gain 5 million more voters.

If you follow the trend, you can see what exceptional voter turnout looks like with Obama and Raegan, but that goes without mentioning that Obama's 2008 victory looks totally unnatural. He should have won with around 4-5 million less votes than he had, based on voter counts in the surround years, especially considering the numbers calm back down for his re-election, and settle into the trend again for 2016.

MY MAIN POINT HERE is that 2020, if you follow the trend in these numbers, we should have had about 108-110 million voters TOTAL, but somehow we have over 140 million TOTAL this year. It's absolutely UNNATURAL to our election growth trends.

TYPICALLY when the the winner of an election wins in a large lead, the opposition reduces in percentage of total voters to reflect the lead. Biden's lead does NOT do this AT ALL.

>>11516448

To follow up on my point, I got my math wrong typing this. We should have around 120 mil votes. But the difference Joe wins by makes sense if you consider the numbers here. 14 Million? If you subtract 80% of 14 million from Joe Bidens vote count total, you end up with numbers that DO IN FACT correlate with our election turnout pattern. LOOK AT THAT

>>11516492

But the jumps do not account for Obama 08, or Biden 20. Is it no coincidence that they are the only outliers? The 04 election you refer to does not see anything close as it still follows the regular growth trend over terms.

>>11516528

I only saw this floating around here earlier today. I just used the 14 mil from it cause it was available. Point still stands, If trump had 70 mil and Biden had at most 65 mil, or vice versa, I'd believe it. But for them both to swing 70+mil is unprecedented.

Biden's actions today have sparked my gut feeling that something is definitely afoot, and they most definitely have not gotten away with it.