Anonymous ID: c666de Nov. 6, 2020, 9:57 p.m. No.11516043   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>11516012

Explains the complete decoupling between positive cases and hospitalizations and deaths.

They've relaxed the diagnosis requirements.

Current assessment is diagnosing people with mostly dead viruses.

They've already gotten it and recovered, and are no longer contagious.

Anonymous ID: c666de Nov. 6, 2020, 10:14 p.m. No.11516245   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6273

>>11516100

I read a study earlier this week (sorry no link, on mobile) that suggested it would be better to use these more sensitive but cheap tests and an initial filter, THEN using the longer more accurate tests (with a lower Ct) to confirm.

 

The idea is to id cases of people who should quarantine while longer test is running, but also clear people who are not positive quickly.

Anonymous ID: c666de Nov. 6, 2020, 10:46 p.m. No.11516574   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6597 >>6622 >>6649

>>11516485

Bentons law and other statistical abnormalities tell us that cheating occurred, but that isn't going to be enough for a court or the public.

 

The proof has to be rock solid evidence.

Tainted ballots. Missing watermarks. Communication logs. Corrupt server code. Witnesses.

And it has to be massive… everywhere… enough to negate thousands of votes in multiple states.

 

The public isn't going to accept winning through simple lawfare.

We need to prove Biden cheated.