>Biden is basically the same again, policy wise
110 million followers on twitter vs. 14 million. And yes, Obama was universally loved by the left, and still is.
No, Biden is not "basically the same" policy wise, not even
close.
They've crossed into 40+ now. The latest (rapid) test is 40-45 in general. On top of that, it detects
various other "corona viruses" as covid19, as well as mycoplasma pneumoniae. Guess what the latter's
symptoms are? Atypical pneumonia, lack of sputum (dry cough), anemia, replicates lung cells
to hide from your immune system… Yeah.
Of course not. The only reason Biden got the nod was because of the way all of the other candidates
dropped out. Bernie would have been their choice, otherwise, but Bernie isn't "controlled" in the
same was as Biden. And the only people that would really vote for Bernie are millenials/under 35
crowd. He's kind of an idiot, after all.
Quite literally not true.
I'm not a government employee. But I do work with them. They're thrilled they finally got a raise
after years of watching everyone pass them by.
He's a socialist. Only a liar or an idiot thinks socialism is a good idea.
The way it's always been done, and the way that works, is for a doctor to diagnose SYMPTOMS, then
test if they need to rule out other diseases for reasons of treatment. In general, the treatment
for covid19 is about the same as for the flu, unless you end up requiring oxygen. The only
reason to test is if they suspect a bacterial infection.
Note, btw, we test about 1.2-1.3 million people every year for the flu, and we tested that many
yesterday for covid19. The former is deadly for children as well, covid19 is not.
The VA is a wreck. But Trump has been improving it. I work with a guy whose wife is helping
them upgrade their facilities. Her work seems meaningful, from what I can tell.
There is one thing I like about them: altitude does not impact their power. Otherwise, throw the batteries
on wheels away. No different than a pumpkin spice beer, IMO.
>You know another country recently democratically elected a socialist lest month, right?
Oh boy, they elected one. They've elected many over the years. Not sure how you think
that matters. People are stupid. Socialism exists because of that.
>Bernie isn't even a socialist. He calls himself DemSoc but hardly lives up to the name.
Yes he is. He's lying to you, and you're stupid enough to believe him.
>He's basically just about social support (completely unrelated to socialism, it's things like Trump buck but not just for a small number of people, and health care to avoid sick people not taking time off work and giving everyone else the flue which is horrible for the economy)
That's not "completely unrelated to socialism." Socialism is about collective control of resources
instead of individual control. That's what he wants.
>He literally isn't increasing your tax to do it, unless you are close to a billionaire.
You don't understand how socialism works (or fails, for that matter), apparently.
> He's just not using it to support 'socialism for corporations' (bailouts, tax breaks, etc.) like the past three presidents do.
There is no such thing as "socialism for corporations." It's a meaningless phrase. Learn
economics.
>What makes you think he's a socialist?
He wants me to pay for others' well-being. That's the fundamental concept behind socialism. Hiding
that concept behind the phrase "democratic" doesn't change that.
>He doesn't really allow anyone to seize the means of production (and if, by chance, you don't know that sentence, you have been given a mistaken defintion of socialist)
Requiring people to work for the benefit of others is most certainly controlling the means of
production. You are the one that doesn't understand what it means.
>I am not a socialist, I just talk to people with many different political views.
Yes, you are, you just haven't admitted it to yourself yet. Sorry to break the news to you.
Government run anything will always be a wreck. There's no way around it - lack of competition
creates massive inefficiency. Even if they try to bid out what they do to make it competitive it still
suffers from government bureaucracy. It is inevitable.
Not without a few rounds from me.
It's supposedly from a post on AP OneWire. Otherwise unsourced. So bullshit until more info.
A state-level actor could create forgeries IF they had advance knowledge of the protections put in
place. That's the problem. Did they? Also, did states put protections in place? The answer to the
latter is "some did, some didn't." To the former, shrug.
My odds on favorite is they had access to the cheaters' comms. There was even a judge that
was indicted this summer, in Philly I think, for ballot stuffing. There were others mentioned, but
unnamed in his case. They probably all talked. The point of these one-off indictments is to hint
at what's going on behind the scenes.
That would be part of it, sure.
Remember watching all the riots? The dudes running around with earpieces? Those were feds.
They're everywhere. Wray's job has been to make the FBI invisible. It worked. They've infiltrated
every subversive organization out there.
It is, but they have another document posted on their website that lists all the protection measures
that are currently in place. The ones that would matter are all "some states do this." States still get
to do their own thing, and that won't change until the states agree to let the feds take over.