>>11515815

Then tell me what is wrong with the logic.

If your party have had the most votes ever for the past three years, even when losing an election due to electoral college, it's believable for it to happen again.

>>11515821

>and he was universally loved by the left

No he wasn't. Go to a leftist site (not neoliberal, actual leftist). They think he's a capitalist war criminal (drone striking in Yemen and Libya) who bailed out banks. They think he's a polished turd. Moderate liberals liked him but isn't wasn't universal at all.

Biden is basically the same again, policy wise. There's no real reason to expect much less turnout for him (all the people who think he's a creep aren't going to switch to 'grab em by the pussy').

>That was only 4 years ago.

Population growth is exponential, not linear. On top of that, leftists hated Hillary far more than Biden, it wasn't just the Republicans who fucking despise her. She was annoying and controversial and far more right wing in terms of economical right.

>>11515846

Biden explicitly said many times, including the last town hall, that he wants to add special funding to the police, so people concerned about defunding the police shouldn't dislike him for that.

>>11515815

Then tell me what is wrong with the logic.

If your party have had the most votes ever for the past three years, even when losing an election due to electoral college, it's believable for it to happen again.

>>11515821

>and he was universally loved by the left

No he wasn't. Go to a leftist site (not neoliberal, actual leftist). They think he's a capitalist war criminal (drone striking in Yemen and Libya) who bailed out banks. They think he's a polished turd. Moderate liberals liked him but isn't wasn't universal at all.

Biden is basically the same again, policy wise. There's no real reason to expect much less turnout for him (all the people who think he's a creep aren't going to switch to 'grab em by the pussy').

>That was only 4 years ago.

Population growth is exponential, not linear. On top of that, leftists hated Hillary far more than Biden, it wasn't just the Republicans who fucking despise her. She was annoying and controversial and far more right wing in terms of economical right.

>>11515846

Biden explicitly said many times, including the last town hall, that he wants to add special funding to the police, so people concerned about defunding the police shouldn't dislike him for that.

>>11516001

>and everybody on the chans knows it.

Tell me two non-dead chans that don't think Q Patriots are fucking retards.

Go there, post saying "God Bless Q", and link the post here.

For a possible easy win, I would suggest 4chan.org/pol/, the birthplace of Q.

>>11516051

Why don't you find out yourself instead of trusting anonymous complete strangers with no reputation?

>>11516067

cope harder

>>11516081

And runs away afterwards like a ghetto black father.

>>11516077

If I say I'll fix your fence next week and four years later it isn't fixed, patience is not the issue.

Drop #1 still hasn't come true.

>>11516048

bumping this

>>11516128

#1 still hasn't come true

>>11516197

>esoteric mysticism

If you're not masturbating to your god, get on my level newfag

>>11516211

Bernie

>>11516210

Say that to an EMT.

>>11516232

Don't worry, we'll pretend to you it's part of the plan!

>>11516237

You know another country recently democratically elected a socialist lest month, right?

Bernie isn't even a socialist. He calls himself DemSoc but hardly lives up to the name. He's basically just about social support (completely unrelated to socialism, it's things like Trump buck but not just for a small number of people, and health care to avoid sick people not taking time off work and giving everyone else the flue which is horrible for the economy)

He literally isn't increasing your tax to do it, unless you are close to a billionaire. He's just not using it to support 'socialism for corporations' (bailouts, tax breaks, etc.) like the past three presidents do.

What makes you think he's a socialist? He doesn't really allow anyone to seize the means of production (and if, by chance, you don't know that sentence, you have been given a mistaken defintion of socialist)

I am not a socialist, I just talk to people with many different political views.

>>11516312

What is coming?

>>11516324

Q only moved here in 2017. The site existed since 2012 and was a good place until the /pol/ board started invading others and got in the news for terrorism, and when Qboomers came to the site and Jim Watkins exploited them for merch and newspaper donations.

This board is literally only here because it allows him to make money off the ads. He and this board are responsible for destroying hundreds of online communities.

>>11516327

I don't know what news you're watching, but we are allowed to go out just like you are in the US. There's nothing fascist about it. We don't even have to wear masks outside of medical places, except for a week if a place has a massive outbreak.

>>11516397

>ALL of America's enemies are here too.

I haven't seen Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Russia, China, North Korea, Venezuela, Syria, Cuba, Based Bolivia, Nicaragua, Germany, almost the entirety of South America, almost the entirety of Africa and the remaining Middle Eastern nations, plus some more, here.

In fact, most of the foreigners here are from countries that were allied before Trump withdrew from international alliances.

>>11516431

Yes. An appropriate name for a voting machine, don't you think?

>>11516448

Don't underestimate how many people love Trump and how many people hate Trump. But more importantly, how many people fucking hate Hillary Clinton. She caused many former Democrats to vote for Trump and many far-leftists to abstain the election all-together.

You'll notice the total votes jump after a national crisis, like they did in the election after 9/11. Same thing with coronavirus.

>>11516488

Yes.

Now say that to all the Q Patriots about the Dems and see how many agree.

>>11516505

>It's OK though, most of their hearts are in the right place.

Eh, kinda yeah and kinda no. Adolf Hilter's heart was in the right place (taking his nation, Germany, out of an extreme recession resulting from the harsh Treaty of Versailles, trying to make their culture better in his eyes and destroying perceived national enemies) but that doesn't excuse what he did to Europe and the US.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

>>11516523

>None of this really matters in the end.

Yes.

I don't agree with the entire post but its a far healthier outlook on life than most people have. The whole 'life ends in a utopia with [72 virgins/white clouds] if you follow the right book (but ignore all the bits about mixing dairy and meat and threads of two plants)' allows people to justify horrible things.

>>11516250

Yes. That's exactly the point.

Most of them prefer the candidate which has a health care plan and who takes an epidemic seriously because they're the ones exposed to it and who fucking die.

>inb4 its not real

Ask them. They would know better than you or me.

>>11516287

#1 still hasn't happened, nor has #15