dChan
Anonymous ID: 513231 April 22, 2018, 8:01 p.m. No.1151890   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1920 >>2002

>>1151780

Effective radiated power degrades exponentially with man made emp devices.

They can't even make a reliable one that kills cars when under the hood.

Not likely useful at atmospheric level, and closer to ground would only affect a few city blocks. Not to mention the initiating pulse would have to be such magnitude it would cause as much damage physically from the blast.

Not worth the trouble when other more suitable weapons exist.

 

Try making a emp device. I done it small scale, but it is hardly effective at 3 inches! Even an emp detector 100m away had hard time detecting it every time - even when it delivered a good pulse.

 

And furthermore, a nuke does not carry emp of any significance against all "common knowledge".

There are literally hundreds of VIDEO CAMERA FOOTAGE of nuke detonations at close proximity.

ALL of the cameras survived, and before you say they are shielded- think CCD and LENS have to be directed at the source of the footage…

No special cameras were used.

Anonymous ID: 513231 April 22, 2018, 8:03 p.m. No.1151920   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1151890

>ALL of the cameras survived,

Technically I meant the camera delivered good footage- some of them were destroyed by the nuclear blast, but not emp (that would have burned out camera before the nuclear blast arrived).

(had to set my own record straight)

Anonymous ID: 513231 April 22, 2018, 8:17 p.m. No.1152088   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>1152002

Yes. This is a thing.

Also 'strings' of conductive wires.

 

But to me personally it does not affect me.

I am 100%off grid.

Internet would go down, that's as hard as I would feel it.

My house is lightning proof, and shielded from EMI and microwave (metal structure with wiring all inside conduit that are external to building.

Solar panels are thinfilm atop metal backing, suppressed to building frame.

(I too, expected her to win )