dChan
Anonymous ID: 552472 Nov. 6, 2020, 11:09 p.m. No.11516755   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6768 >>6900 >>7109 >>7321

"quantum dots" for fluorescent tagging

 

page 15: quantum dots for experimental anti-fraud labeling

 

https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0917/ML091740009.pdf

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/quantum_dot

 

A random example of a patent for this technology: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3150399A1/en

 

I Bing-searched for "quantum dots fluorescence watermark" and there is much much more to examine.

 

It seems to me that no technology exists to use an entangled state or any sort of quantum-informational advantage. It does make sense that they could use "quantum dots" as tags to be able to 'watermark' ballots and track in that limited sense. Perhaps there was some non-scientist's phone game from 'quantum dot tracking' to 'quantum information/encryption tracking' that has wandered into our conversation? The 'quantum encryption state' within piece of paper idea seems really bad. The idea of these dots being used is not so crazy at all, and reliable proven methods as would work in court actually exist.

 

"quantum dots" are sort of like tunable-fluorescent very large molecules. They are proposed for use in various unrelated schemes, but they have a property of being fluorescent to a highly tunable narrow (single) frequency. This means if you shine a certain frequency of light on them, they re-emit photons at a very specific frequency. I don't think other quantum information technologies are presently engineered for any sort of use of quantum properties such an 'encrypted quantum state' like two separated but entangled particles, or an object that could be 'tracked' in non-proximity-requiring way or with satellites.

 

The quantum dots, in theory, could be in the ballot, and could be spatially arranged in ways that encode, as well as having different combinations of fluorescent frequencies that they react to upon light being shined on them. For example, maybe dots were reliable made for 3 or 4 frequencies, and laid out in a pattern of consecutive rectangles. What is interesting, is the DHS or someone else could in theory have placed machines in the US mail system that could track the motion of these objects automatically as they were sorted, right along with stamp-checking, etc.

 

So consider that the INFOWARS interview is maybe an ignorant riff off of a misunderstanding of a misunderstanding of something maybe someone said…

 

I suppose it is 'possible' that the dots could be made to work at frequencies with excellent penetrance in atmosphere and even building materials. I suppose a satellite could be pinging these objects and decently tracking the ballots as they moved around on the surface of the Earth. Maybe the coolers were lead-walled such that the tracking from satellites using quantum dot pinging would be confused/hampered or loose ability to detect use of quantum dot forgeries. This final bit is far more tenuous or unclear the the idea that quantum dots could be used for fraud detection.