>>11519531 (lb)
>I’ll have you know …
Ahhhhh…how I’ve missed those words! It’s been a long time…so long, I thought I might never see them again. Ty CopyPastaImpAnon!
Shame the pic is missing, tho.
>sorry @Timcast this was no "glitch"
Correct. This was “Malicious Coding”, not a “Glitch”.
We need to INSIST it be referred to as “malicious coding”!
A “Glitch” implies a one-off, unintentional error and is meant to reinforce the MSMDNC false narrative; “Malicious Coding” references the truth: it was a purposeful, scripted action intended to change the results of the vote count!
The language we use when talking about this ongoing fraud MATTERS! It was “malicious coding”, frens…Spread it far and wide!!