>>11521081

Bill Clinton, aWHITEperson, is a rapist.

I mention the rapist Bill Clinton is aWHITErapist because "it's a fact" that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE.

You need to read my words repeating that aWHITEperson is a rapist. KeepWHITEand rapist in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, my shill code rules is to call YOU aWHITEperson trying to defend rape.

As I said before, the rapist Bill Clinton being aWHITEperson is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtaposeWHITEwith 'rapist', because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about a rapist beingWHITEas me trying to increase racial division by repeating this fact that a rapist isWHITE, then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, and then reduce you and call you 'a fuckingWHITEshill trying to defendWHITErapists'.

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, there is nothing deceitful going on by my repeating that for your eyes to see.

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there are rapists who are notWHITE, yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE.

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselvesWHITEwho are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE.

Karl Marx said that everyone's thoughts and values are nothing but promotions of the 'group' to which they can be sub-divided. The fact my shill code is derived from a Jew and not aWHITEperson I hope you do not notice, because it would blow up my own narrative.

Let's get back to the fact that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE.

I haven't seen anyone 'disprove' this, and anyone who addresses my post in a challenging way must by my shill code rule be aWHITEperson themselves only trying to promoteWHITErapists.

There can be no other motivation from anyone who challenges me, right?

So to summarize, I am totally not trying to condition anyone's minds into viewing their fellow humans asWHITEandOTHER THAN WHITE, I am just going to keep repeating that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, totally not suspicious intents at all, totally not intended to make readers see humanity as not unified but divided, that I myself am totally not suspiciously trying to cover for and keep away from the narrative THE GREAT DECEIVERS who want humanity divided by race, religion, sex, class, and political affiliation.

All my innocent little self is doing is mentioning the fact that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE, and if you want to perceive what I am writing as meant to divide the people by race, then my shill code rule is to say that you're just aWHITEperson trying to run to the defense of yourWHITErace.

Did I mention that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE? I want to be sure that we are all nicely educated people who know the facts of reality, because it is a fact after all that the rapist Bill Clinton isWHITE.

After you have read all this, and associated 'rapist' withWHITEin your mind, then you will be who I say you should be, reduced to either attacking or defendingWHITEpeople no matter what, because your race and religion and sex and class and political affiliation is all that really matters.

>>11521048

Bill Cosby, aBLACKperson, is a rapist.

I mention the rapist Bill Cosby is aBLACKrapist because "it's a fact" that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK.

You need to read my words repeating that aBLACKperson is a rapist. KeepBLACKand rapist in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, my shill code rules is to call YOU aBLACKperson trying to defend rape.

As I said before, the rapist Bill Cosby being aBLACKperson is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtaposeBLACKwith 'rapist', because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about a rapist beingBLACKas me trying to increase racial division by repeating this fact that a rapist isBLACK, then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, and then reduce you and call you 'a fuckingBLACKshill trying to defendBLACKrapists'.

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, there is nothing deceitful going on by my repeating that for your eyes to see.

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there are rapists who are notBLACK, yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK.

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselvesBLACKwho are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK.

Karl Marx said that everyone's thoughts and values are nothing but promotions of the 'group' to which they can be sub-divided. The fact my shill code is derived from a Jew and not aBLACKperson I hope you do not notice, because it would blow up my own narrative.

Let's get back to the fact that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK.

I haven't seen anyone 'disprove' this, and anyone who addresses my post in a challenging way must by my shill code rule be aBLACKperson themselves only trying to promoteBLACKrapists.

There can be no other motivation from anyone who challenges me, right?

So to summarize, I am totally not trying to condition anyone's minds into viewing their fellow humans asBLACKandOTHER THAN BLACK, I am just going to keep repeating that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, totally not suspicious intents at all, totally not intended to make readers see humanity as not unified but divided, that I myself am totally not suspiciously trying to cover for and keep away from the narrative THE GREAT DECEIVERS who want humanity divided by race, religion, sex, class, and political affiliation.

All my innocent little self is doing is mentioning the fact that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK, and if you want to perceive what I am writing as meant to divide the people by race, then my shill code rule is to say that you're just aBLACKperson trying to run to the defense of yourBLACKrace.

Did I mention that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK? I want to be sure that we are all nicely educated people who know the facts of reality, because it is a fact after all that the rapist Bill Cosby isBLACK.

After you have read all this, and associated 'rapist' withBLACKin your mind, then you will be who I say you should be, reduced to either attacking or defendingBLACKpeople no matter what, because your race and religion and sex and class and political affiliation is all that really matters.

FOX NEAS STOPHAVING SPEAKERS ON WHO KEEP PUSHING THE FALSE FALSE FALSE CLAIM THAT THERE IS 'NO EVIDENCE OF FRAUD'

CITIZEN JOURNALISTS ARE POSTING THOUSANDS OF EXAMPLES!