Anonymous ID: 6cd004 Nov. 7, 2020, 7:51 p.m. No.11535436   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Lawfag's (1L) analysis

>Issue: if state legislatures did not statutorily approve changes to ballot verification or form for mail in ballots issued as a result of the pandemic, should non absentee mail in ballots be subject to the same processes as normal absentee ballots would in a regular year, despite state court or executive orders to the contrary?

 

>Answer: OFC.

>Reasoning: because Art. 1 Sec. 4. states

"The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators."

> the changes made by courts and Governors are invalid. This is a simple con law slam dunk

>Result: Complete recount under absentee ballot verification rules for any state that didn't pass legislation to clear this up. (IDK who did, I know PA didn't). In applicable states, every absentee ballot gets challenged by the Republicans. Hundreds of thousands (maybe over a million) get thrown in the trash because they fail verification.

 

Trump wins. Shills cry in mommy's basement. Blow holes in my analysis, shills.

 

Shill attempts so far

>Recounts won't change it

its the challenging, not the recounting that matters

>like no votes geet successfully challenged

because there are almost no absentees in the first place, and niggers are not filling them out

>but you have to have mail ins, there's a pandemic

and they need to follow the rules