Anonymous ID: 35bcb5 Nov. 8, 2020, 3:04 p.m. No.11547460   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Okay - from OAN presser in Vegas:

 

Signature matching by machine not reliable because DPI of scanner set too low! This makes total sense to anyone who understands such things. There is no independent verification of signature matches as it happens when human eyes see the two and make a determination. Everyone sees things differently, and so that is why the match can be challenged. Not so with the machine verification. Nevada put these machines in place "knowingly" and thought they wouldn't be caught because who but a few understand dpi and scanning?

Anonymous ID: 35bcb5 Nov. 8, 2020, 3:09 p.m. No.11547534   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7582 >>7730

You do realize "all assets deployed" meant the Dems deployed them, right? We never deployed anything. No one stopped this shit before it happened. The idea it has to happen to expose it is nonsense. If you were in control why wouldn't you stop it before it happened and expose it at the same time? I don't understand all the subtleties of this type of warfare, I guess. I think it stinks and hurts too many people to be effective or necessary. No reason why this couldn't have been STOPPED if Patriots were / are in control.

Anonymous ID: 35bcb5 Nov. 8, 2020, 3:17 p.m. No.11547666   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11547582

The crime of rigging ballots and machines is easily stopped and proven if people are in place to stop it. When the programming or ballot drops come in, there is a "sting" operation to catch them. I thought that is how law enforcement works. You catch and arrest them IN THE ACT.