American Patriot Trump Supporters Right Now
Voters Remorse is Rising to Epic Proportions
Voters remorse (VM), which historically shows up months after an election, began in 2020 before the election, the day after the third debate as Google Trends documented that unique searches of the phrase “can I change my vote?” maxed out beyond all previous records. And now, 5 days after the election with the Media prematurely calling it for their choice while social media gears up to silence anyone who questions the results, including the acting President of the United States, VM is poised to reach epic levels.
Biden voters are thinking to themselves right about now "if I end up with Biden as President because the Media told me I must hate Trump, I will be in a real pickle. I won’t be able to object to Biden or complain about him. That'll be “hate speech.” Biden's going to bring down systemic racism, remember?
Even without dementia, Biden would struggle to be an effective representative of the people because he has little genuine support from them. This is even more true for Kamala if she were to become the first female President by default. A female who insults minorities by calling herself a “woman of color” who only had enjoyed 3.4% support from Democrat voters when she dropped out of the primary race.
Do American women really want the first female President of the United States to be an unpopular candidate installed this way? Do they want to give Kamala that historic title and risk her being a failure as the first female President of the United States?
VM Rising…
WAS ‘CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE’ TRENDING ON GOOGLE?
https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/10/26/can-i-change-my-vote-trending/?fbclid=IwAR3_ZBykc3szlXWx1X2elV_zyLZbc6Z2nhvpcKSakQAU2lXWS3U-45fBATo
>https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/289108003
Scytl
How not to prove your election outcome
https://sci-hub.do/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00048
The Scytl/SwissPost e-voting solution was intended
to provide complete verifiability for Swiss government elections.
We show failures in both individual verifiability and universal
verifiability (as defined in Swiss Federal Ordinance 161.116),
based on mistaken implementations of cryptographic components.
These failures allow for the construction of “proofs” of an
accurate election outcome that pass verification though the
votes have been manipulated. Using sophisticated cryptographic
protocols without a proper consideration of what properties they
offer, and under which conditions, can introduce opportunities
for undetectable fraud even though the system appears to allow
verification of the outcome.
Our findings are immediately relevant to systems in use in
Switzerland and Australia, and probably also elsewhere.