Anonymous ID: 28faa5 Nov. 8, 2020, 8 p.m. No.11551864   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2170 >>2349

>>11551033

 

Voters Remorse is Rising to Epic Proportions

 

Voters remorse (VM), which historically shows up months after an election, began in 2020 before the election, the day after the third debate as Google Trends documented that unique searches of the phrase “can I change my vote?” maxed out beyond all previous records. And now, 5 days after the election with the Media prematurely calling it for their choice while social media gears up to silence anyone who questions the results, including the acting President of the United States, VM is poised to reach epic levels.

 

Biden voters are thinking to themselves right about now "if I end up with Biden as President because the Media told me I must hate Trump, I will be in a real pickle. I won’t be able to object to Biden or complain about him. That'll be “hate speech.” Biden's going to bring down systemic racism, remember?

 

Even without dementia, Biden would struggle to be an effective representative of the people because he has little genuine support from them. This is even more true for Kamala if she were to become the first female President by default. A female who insults minorities by calling herself a “woman of color” who only had enjoyed 3.4% support from Democrat voters when she dropped out of the primary race.

 

Do American women really want the first female President of the United States to be an unpopular candidate installed this way? Do they want to give Kamala that historic title and risk her being a failure as the first female President of the United States?

 

VM Rising…

 

WAS ‘CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE’ TRENDING ON GOOGLE?

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/10/26/can-i-change-my-vote-trending/?fbclid=IwAR3_ZBykc3szlXWx1X2elV_zyLZbc6Z2nhvpcKSakQAU2lXWS3U-45fBATo

Anonymous ID: 28faa5 Nov. 8, 2020, 8:24 p.m. No.11552242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2290 >>2393

>>11551503

>https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/289108003

 

Scytl

 

How not to prove your election outcome

https://sci-hub.do/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00048

 

The Scytl/SwissPost e-voting solution was intended

to provide complete verifiability for Swiss government elections.

We show failures in both individual verifiability and universal

verifiability (as defined in Swiss Federal Ordinance 161.116),

based on mistaken implementations of cryptographic components.

These failures allow for the construction of “proofs” of an

accurate election outcome that pass verification though the

votes have been manipulated. Using sophisticated cryptographic

protocols without a proper consideration of what properties they

offer, and under which conditions, can introduce opportunities

for undetectable fraud even though the system appears to allow

verification of the outcome.

Our findings are immediately relevant to systems in use in

Switzerland and Australia, and probably also elsewhere.