Hopefully this doesn't turn in to a three hour slide, but I'm having trouble understanding why some anons insist nothing says "Qanon" anymore. I didn't interpret it like that and find it odd that we would change things after they've been more or less staple for the last two years.

Anons still send people to qanon.pub and still post caps from there…

What made people think Q wanted us to remove "Qanon" from everything? Supposed insiders have never weighed in on their nicknames on chans before. I get that we made the exception for the Q Clearance Patriot(s) with the famefag situation, but it doesn't really seem like Q wanted us to abandon our naming process just because the corporate news networks are launching an intelligence operation against Q and us.

I'm thinking someone hoaxed you guys. I saw the arguments back and forth for a week and it seems like things just do not add up.

Just some thoughts.

>>11552764

>>11552797

I can confirm patchfag wasn't here at the beginning of kun.

>>11552830

That guy is Kantbot.

You can look him up on Twitter. I forget the handle.

>>11552840

I see some repeat mentions of FBIanon, meganon, bdanon and other examples and those arguments seem well founded. We don't really need to draw this out though.

>>11552846

I don't think it necessarily has to be shills, but maybe it was a good opportunity to stoke division.

>>11552859

I'm pretty sure you're thinking of the gerbil guy, anon.

>>11552895

Yes, I think I worded that oddly.

I meant to say I didn't see the copypasta and format since the time mentioned.

>>11552930

>There's magic out there!

>>11552981

That was right around the time when anons had a few discussions about anons not being "Qanons".

Again, Q can reject the name all they want, but they don't get to decide what we call them.

Why waste time on arguing over what nickname you get? This is something you learn about in grade school, anon.

Again, I think Q was correcting the youtube/twitter normies like Eddie Bravo who called us "Qanons". This makes a lot more sense to me than it being a weird way to suggest we take down all of the images and videos we've done in reference to "Qanon" and take down one of the most important websites to this movement.

>>11553030

>>11553005

Ahh, this seems like an interesting take and one I can accept that leads to a shill-free interpretation.

Thanks for the take, anon.

>>11553160

>Hilter was actually the good guy

Not really, dumbass.

There was a fabricated "concerted" effort by "Jews" to target "Jews" through Hitler, who was close to the Vatican… which is just crypto "Jews".

The Vatican bent to the Roths and families.

First, the Balfour Declaration was declared and then the process began of scraping away Palestine and agitating tensions in EU which lead to Hitler's rise in power. Hitler began giving "Jews" a good reason to flee, which he allowed under the Havaara Agreement, which extracted wealth across EU and solidified Israel as a nation.

Yes, esoteric elements of the Sun "Cult" emanated from the "Nazis" and they did report some very interesting shit in Antarctica, which no tourists are allowed to and is never contested by any nation, but more about that another time.

To add to this, the "Ice Wall" is a historically described monument, which the recording of necessarily disappeared in the fifties (encyclopedias).

Hitler's subordinates learned of Thule and/or Atlantis via the occult orders and although plenty veered off course, many "conspiracy theories" seem to indicate some very interesting objects and ideas were (re)discovered as a result.

Ultimately, Hitler was a puppet, but whether or not he faked his death once he learned more of the truth can be up for debate for all I care.