Anonymous ID: b8be92 Nov. 9, 2020, 6:58 p.m. No.11568333   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8611 >>8738 >>8909

Barr Hands Prosecutors the Authority to Investigate Voter Fraud Claims

 

Attorney General William P. Barr, wading into President Trump’s unfounded accusations of widespread election irregularities, told federal prosecutors on Monday that they were allowed to investigate “specific allegations” of voter fraud before the results of the presidential race are certified.

 

Mr. Barr’s authorization prompted the Justice Department official who oversees investigations of voter fraud, Richard Pilger, to step down from the post within hours, according to an email Mr. Pilger sent to colleagues that was obtained by The New York Times.

 

Mr. Barr said he had authorized “specific instances” of investigative steps in some cases. He made clear in a carefully worded memo that prosecutors had the authority to investigate, but he warned that “specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims should not be a basis for initiating federal inquiries.”

 

Mr. Barr’s directive ignored the Justice Department’s longstanding policies intended to keep law enforcement from affecting the outcome of an election. And it followed a move weeks before the election in which the department lifted a prohibition on voter fraud investigations before an election.

 

“Given that voting in our current elections has now concluded, I authorize you to pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections in your jurisdictions,” Mr. Barr wrote.

 

A Justice Department official said that Mr. Barr had authorized scrutiny of allegations about ineligible voters in Nevada and backdated mail-in ballots Pennsylvania. Republicans have circulated both claims in recent days without any evidence emerging to back them.

 

Mr. Barr did not write the memo at the direction of Mr. Trump, the White House or any Republican lawmakers, the official said.

 

Mr. Barr has privately told department officials in the days since the election that any disputes should be resolved in court by the campaigns themselves, according to three people briefed on the conversations. He has said that he did not see massive fraud, and that most of the allegations of voter fraud were related to individual instances that did not point to a larger systemic problem, the people said.

 

But critics of Mr. Barr immediately condemned the memo as a political act that undermined the Justice Department’s typical independence from the White House.

Editors’ Picks

The Best Half-Hour of Comedy in 2020 Is About … Scaffolding?

At Home With Our Ancient Cousins, the Neanderthals

Our Food Staff’s 21 Favorite Thanksgiving Recipes

 

“It would be problematic enough if Barr were reversing longstanding Justice Department guidance because of significant, substantiated claims of misconduct — that could presumably be handled at the local and state level,” said Stephen I. Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law.

 

“But to do so when there is no such evidence — and when the president’s clear strategy is to delegitimize the results of a proper election — is one of the more problematic acts of any attorney general in my lifetime,” Mr. Vladeck added.

 

Mr. Pilger, a career prosecutor in the department’s Public Integrity Section who oversaw voting-fraud-related investigations, told colleagues he would move to a nonsupervisory role working on corruption prosecutions.

 

“Having familiarized myself with the new policy and its ramifications,” he wrote, “I must regretfully resign from my role as director of the Election Crimes Branch.” A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Mr. Pilger’s message.

 

Justice Department policies prohibit federal prosecutors from taking overt steps, like questioning witnesses or securing subpoenas for documents, to open a criminal investigation into any election-related matter until after voting results have been certified to keep their existence from spilling into public view and influencing either voters or local election officials who ensure the integrity of the results.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/us/politics/barr-elections.html

Anonymous ID: b8be92 Nov. 9, 2020, 7:14 p.m. No.11568619   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8738 >>8909

>>11568364

 

Oregon's elections director was abruptly fired in a text message by the secretary of state after he pointed out serious issues with the state's aging and vulnerable technology for running elections.

 

Elections Director Stephen Trout learned in a text message Thursday night — as his department and county elections officials were still counting votes from the Nov. 3 election — that he was out.

 

On Friday, Secretary of State Bev Clarno, a Republican appointed to the position by Democratic Gov. Kate Brown, announced to county clerks and other elections officials in Oregon's 36 counties that “today is also Steve Trout’s last day with the Agency.”

 

Election officials in the state were stunned.

 

Steve Druckenmiller, the veteran Linn County clerk, said Clarno's action was “dangerous and so ignorant.”

 

“We are still in the election process right now. We are reconciling, we’re dealing with problems right now as far as your signatures and communicating with voters who didn’t sign the ballots," Druckenmiller said. “We’re going to have to do recounts, all of these things. She doesn’t understand elections.”

 

Clarno’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

Trout, in a Nov. 2 letter to the Republican and Democratic candidates to replace Clarno, described problems with the internet technology side of the secretary of state's office.

 

He also said federal money had been misspent and that $5.7 million in federal CARES Act allocations must be returned by Dec. 31 because the Legislature did not authorize to “spend a penny.” Another $6 million in Help America Vote Act funds must be used by a later date.

 

This happened even as the Oregon Centralized Voter Registration system is so old that Microsoft no longer supports the Windows Server 2008 system that it operates on, Trout and county election officials said.

 

The secretary of state's office was going to take bids — known as a request for proposal, or RFP — in October for a new system, but Clarno paused it without consulting with the county clerks or Trout, the ousted election director said.

 

Harney County Clerk Derrin “Dag” Robinson said Monday he felt frustrated.

 

“We went through a lot of work to develop an RFP and then to have the secretary pull the plug on that, and then not even mention it to us,” Robinson said. "The counties are stakeholders in that as well. We were led to believe that there was going to be an RFP going out because there was some funding to help with it. And then, nothing.”

 

Trout said the delay was apparently caused because the purchasing team could not meet a timeline even though the team had been provided with funds for one full-time employee to work exclusively on the request for proposal.

 

“The person did not work exclusively on the RFP which means federal funds were inappropriately used and may need to be returned after an audit,” Trout said.

 

Furthermore, Trout said calls by himself and other election officials for third-party verification systems to prevent Oregon from hacking of election systems went unheeded.

 

The late Dennis Richardson named Trout to the position when he was elected Secretary of State in 2016. Trout previously held the position from 2009 to 2013 under then-Secretary of State Kate Brown.

 

Trout left after Brown faced criticism for giving candidates short notice that the date of their election would change — a responsibility of the elections director.

 

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/09/oregon-elections-director-stephen-trout-fired-after-he-details-problems/6227959002/