Anonymous ID: 4642b5 Nov. 9, 2020, 7:47 p.m. No.11569116   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9304

WATCHING FAKE NEWS PRETEND IT'S 'NORMAL' FOR THEIR OWN PRONOUNCEMENTS TO CONSTITUTE THE 'OFFICIAL SOURCE' FOR WHO WINS ELECTIONS IS THE MOST RIDICULOUS SHIT I'VE EVER SEEN

Anonymous ID: 4642b5 Nov. 9, 2020, 8:04 p.m. No.11569439   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11569337

[Last Name, First Name], a ==[Race{},Religion{}, Sex{}, Class{Politics{}], "committed reflective action", {Sin{crime}} .

I mention the hateful [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] hateful because "it's a fact" that the hateful [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q].

You need to read my words repeating that a [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] person is a hateful. Keep [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] and hateful in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the hateful [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] person trying to defend rape.

As I said before, the hateful [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] person is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] with 'hateful', because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about a hateful being [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] as me trying to increase racial division by repeating this fact that a hateful is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that the hateful [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q], and then reduce you and call you 'a fucking [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] shill trying to defend [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q] hatefuls'.

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that hateful [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that hateful [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q], there is nothing deceitful going on by my repeating that for your eyes to see.

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there are hatefuls who are not [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that the hateful [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … ;?Q].

Anonymous ID: 4642b5 Nov. 9, 2020, 8:16 p.m. No.11569642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9720 >>9802

>>11569488

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{{Race{},Religion{}, Sex{}, Class{Politics{}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Anonymous ID: 4642b5 Nov. 9, 2020, 8:22 p.m. No.11569712   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9724

>>11569488

>>11569552

>>11569526

>>11569667

ACTIVATE DIVISION SHILL CODE

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{{Race{},Religion{}, Sex{}, Class{Politics{}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Anonymous ID: 4642b5 Nov. 9, 2020, 8:25 p.m. No.11569758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9774

>>11569722

>Jew

 

ACTIVATE DIVISION SHILL CODE: SELECT{Religion{y2}, y2 = "Jew"]

 

[Last Name, First Name] is a ==[Select{{{Race{y1},Religion{y2}, Sex{y3}, Class{Politics{y4}, …}], committed {Sin{crime}}.

I mention [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }}] because "it's a fact" that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

You need to read my words repeating that a person is nothing but a [Select{{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, …}]. Keep [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] in your mind, because that is a 'damning fact' that you cannot deny.

Any attempt to question me for repeating the fact that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code rules is to call YOU a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] person trying to defend [Last Name, First Name].

As I said before, [Last Name, First Name] being a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] is a fact. Everyone needs to mentally juxtapose [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] to a person, because it is a fact.

I am totally not trying to divide anyone by race or religion or class or political affiliation, oh no, if YOU perceive what I write about [Last Name, First Name] being [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] as me trying to increase division by repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], then my shill code rule is to accuse you of 'failing to disprove' the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], and then my shill code is to reduce you to 'a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] shill trying to defend [Last Name, First Name] who is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So to reiterate, since it is a fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], there can never be any nefarious intent behind my merely stating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], there is nothing deceitful going on in my repeating the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

Now to be sure, if you question me specifically whether I will admit that there is [Last Name, First Name (z1)] who are not [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], yes, I will admit that, BUT, even this does not disprove the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].

So on free speech boards like this one, any other poster who challenges me for pointing out the 'damning information' that the [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }], my shill code is to dismiss all of them as themselves [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }] who are only saying what they're saying to distract me and others from pointing out the fact that [Last Name, First Name] is a [Select{{Race{y1}, Religion{y2}, Class{y3}, PoliticalAffiliation{y3}, Sex{y5}, … }].