They’re likely spooks, anon. Pics get scrubbed, but typically these people are trained to avoid publicity. I suspect that all significant political figures have a handler from the get-go of their career, which is easier to arrange through a family member and easier still through a spouse. No one gets to live large on the political gravy train (and all that entails) without being suitably “manageable.”
Have you seen the Texas reports on the Dominion software? Might be a place to start. It seems as though most election authorities just bought it without any security and integrity testing. Hardly the sort of rigorous auditing that gaming software has to undergo before making its way into a casino.
It’s in the compilation and tallying of vote data from multiple input sources that this shitshow falls short - but that’s a feature, not a bug. Unlike standard practice in financial systems, where every data operation needs to be auditable, the clowns that write election applications seem to deliberately obfuscate. If you add in connectivity to the internet, you’ve got a mother of a security and data integrity issue. From what I saw of the TX reports, on three separate occasions the application was put through its paces, no one was able to determine what the fuck was going on with the software at all.
5 is the Biden Constant, anon. Everything you ascribe to Joe gets multiplied five times.
I’d rather eat bugs
Amen.
>Both James Biden and Mark Epstein are the Mr. Bigs of the family. Bank on it.
Possibly. And I’m sure both have made out like bandits from their more notorious brothers. But if there are intel operations involving JE and JB, which is highly likely - and almost certain in Epstein’s case, both assets would need close “supervision management,” which might have become the brothers’ rôles.
Anyway, I’m sleepy. Perhaps I’m not making much sense, even to myself!