>>11572746 pb
Insurrection Act wasn't ok with Esper, is it ok with you? Yes, ok, you're up to speed.
When you just "lost" an election and the media is pushing you out the door, firing a defense secretary and getting a new one in there is the last thing you would do if you were planning on letting the media push you out the door.
Signs that we're looking at Q Time, or hot Q action is on the table, would be firing the Defense Secretary who did say he wasn't in favor of the Insurrection Act.
This Insurrection Act might be the thing that we, we as in Q, as distinct from say, Gateway Pundit, push forward.
Only Q was talking about martial law and military tribunals to make locking up the bad guys and maybe chopping their heads off easier, and, really, only the Insurrection Act gets to martial law and military tribunals real quick.
New Sec Def replaces anti Insurrection Act Sec Def
Biden loses states
Rioters Insurrect
Perhaps the Fraud itself is an Insurrection?
Insurrection Act
Martial Law
Many Arrests
Military Tribunals
Guantanamo
They talk about "pathway to 270" on election night. This is pathway to military tribunals. We can see it, it's not like any particular outcome is guaranteed, but when Q first talked about military tribunals, most were very "huh?", I was, but today it doesn't seem at all unrealistic.
Our job is to prepare other people, explain to other people, etc? And we've heard about these military tribunals for 3 years. Have we really been talking about military tribunals, for 3 years? I'd say not really.
The story has been what bad guys do we want to throw in guantanamo bay? But we focused on talking about the bad guys, not on the guantanamo bay.